The problem is readers where English isn’t their primary language.
Saganaki
joined 2 years ago
The issue in question was that Britain designated a specific area around the Falklands as a “no sail zone” and the destroyer was outside that area. It was sailing directly into towards the zone, however.
Even so: As mentioned elsewhere, the captain of said ship even said he was a legitimate target.
EDIT Shit, this is NCD….all according to plan? Destroyer upgraded to submarine.
Sarcasm is hard to portray sometimes.
The joke is “oh, you almost got us to revisit Reddit because porn”
I don’t have the hope you do. The sheer number of people that believe the moon landing was faked is just plain crazy. There were soooo many people involved with that process, yet it’s still not believed.
He’ll have some trouble if he actually tries. Secret service detail for former presidents and all.
While the cones can only refresh at 70, your cones aren’t synchronized. You can “see” a lot higher.
There is no way the virus functioned. Seriously. The guy had no tech background.
There was no need to produce the items in question, so we lost the expertise and the underlying manufacturing facilities/experience/etc. Stuff like: The company that made the windows no longer exists. The company that made the panels still exists, but they can no longer source the strictly defined % alloys as that company no longer exists. Stuff like that.
He was most certainly being sarcastic.
How Hidden Nazi Symbols Were the Tip of a Toxic Iceberg at Life Is Strange Developer Deck Nine - IGN
It’s not that simple. Let’s say you have 100 revisions of an asset and the change happens on revision 42. Multiple people work on the same assets. If the engine in question (I admittedly don’t know what they use) stores each asset on a per-file basis, it’s a little easier. If not and the environment itself is stored in a monolithic file, it’s far worse.
You’ll need to (at best) binary search for the asset. You pull latest, see the bad content is there, try again with revision 50. See it’s there, try again with 25. It’s not there, okay, 37. Etc etc.
Not only that, it’s very often not as simple as just pulling that revision. “Oh. The asset format changed slightly on revision 40?” Time to pull the entire codebase down. “Asset A is referenced by this asset and won’t work because it differs?” Time to sync the entire codebase & assets back.
Etc, etc.
I see hypnotoad, personally.