SapientLasagna

joined 1 year ago
[–] SapientLasagna@lemmy.ca 1 points 6 months ago (2 children)

What "other side"? Vegans? I suppose there are some who are just sort of "cultural vegans" too, where they don't have a moral stance, but are vegan because their friends or family are.

I'm not sure if maybe you're reading more negativity in my comment than I meant. There's certainly nothing wrong with animal welfare as a moral stance.

[–] SapientLasagna@lemmy.ca 5 points 6 months ago (4 children)

Veganism at its core is a moral stance. If not for the moral issues, these people would probably be vegetarian instead. That's not to say that all vegans are the aggressive evangelist kind, but pretty much all vegans choose their diet out of moral concerns (in addition to health and environmental reasons).

[–] SapientLasagna@lemmy.ca 7 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Or they could suck up a bunch of subsidies to get started, then sell their subsidiary to Loblaws. Foreign company gets cash, and Loblaws gets even more market dominance. Everyone wins!

[–] SapientLasagna@lemmy.ca 2 points 6 months ago

Wireshark may or may not help you here. The proposed mechanism is abusing the wake words, which are processed locally on the device. Each marketing wake word could be processed, set a flag and go back to sleep with no network activity. Periodically a bit array of flags would be sent to the server with any other regular traffic (checking for notifications, perhaps). The actual audio never gets sent. I'm not saying that Facebook actually does this, but it's a reasonable explanation for the behaviour seen in the Vice article.

[–] SapientLasagna@lemmy.ca 3 points 6 months ago (1 children)

And their conclusion was completely wrong.

Because unless you’re a journalist, a lawyer, or have some kind of role with sensitive information, the access of your data is only really going to advertisers. If you’re like everyone else, living a really normal life, and talking to your friends about flying to Japan, then it’s really not that different to advertisers looking at your browsing history.

These days, a private conversation about pregnancy, abortion, voting, or your feelings about geopolitical stuff like Gaza or Ukraine could absolutely be used against you, depending on where you live.

[–] SapientLasagna@lemmy.ca 4 points 6 months ago

And take the opportunity to electrify the rail network while we're at it.

[–] SapientLasagna@lemmy.ca 10 points 7 months ago (5 children)

If you look here, you'll see that all the trades involved in housing construction are on the list for fast-track immigration already.

As for training, we may find that it's more the number of people leaving the trades that is the problem. It's not that the pay is bad, exactly, but it's an industry extremely prone to boom/bust cycles. People leave for jobs with some sense of stability. Increasing unionization and enhancing EI might be more cost effective than funding more training.

[–] SapientLasagna@lemmy.ca 4 points 8 months ago

Canada has ~1/4 the firearms per capita compared to the US. My guess is that doesn't matter, as you go over 1 gun/resident the added guns probably don't have much of an impact.

However, most shootings in the US are with handguns (restricted in Canada), and a bunch of high-profile shootings with ARs (prohibited in Canada). Concealed carry is practically never allowed, and open carry isn't either. Safe storage is required, so you can't carry unsecured guns in your car either. Storing loaded firearms is forbidden. Owning firearms for self defense is forbidden by law (using them as such may or may not be, depending on the circumstances).

TL;DR: it's not just how many guns, but also what you're allowed to do with them.

[–] SapientLasagna@lemmy.ca 18 points 8 months ago

They didn't mention that public sector workers are about 60% unionized, but private sector is more like 10%. Collective bargaining typically sets pay on the position, not the worker.

[–] SapientLasagna@lemmy.ca 1 points 10 months ago

Obviously nobody should disappear into secret jails, but victims and witnesses are not on trial, and should have their privacy protected.

Having random people listening to police comms is no substitute for a competent regulator.

[–] SapientLasagna@lemmy.ca 31 points 11 months ago (11 children)

It's supposed to be reflected in the price to the consumer. That's what's supposed to cause the consumers to make less carbon-intensive choices.

For goods or services that don't actually have any fossil carbon used, there probably should be a mechanism to call them out for misinformation.

[–] SapientLasagna@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 year ago

Yeah, we could get a perfect score if we destroyed all the coastal rainforests and replaced them with bamboo plantations.

view more: ‹ prev next ›