Shhalahr

joined 1 year ago
[–] Shhalahr@beehaw.org 2 points 2 months ago

Don't worry Donnie. We're all dying just a little bit more each day.

Life: It's terminal.

[–] Shhalahr@beehaw.org 5 points 2 months ago

How many of them are the "It's not a religion, it's a personal relationship with Jesus," types?

[–] Shhalahr@beehaw.org 2 points 3 months ago

I'm on some text lists. There are definitely some people putting out feelers for Kamala. Got a couple requests for surveys about it.

[–] Shhalahr@beehaw.org 2 points 4 months ago

Worth adding that “unemployment” in this context just means people who are claiming unemployment benefits, a things that runs out, and when they run out, they no longer are counted by it.

✋ This is where I've been for the past year and a half.

[–] Shhalahr@beehaw.org 2 points 5 months ago

I managed to do that with Abbey Road of all things, though a Round Trip example. Started the album on my way out. Paused it while doing some errands. Went home, and it finished up just as I pulled in. Of course, I had to get lucky with traffic flow, so I don't expect to be able to intentionally repeat it.

[–] Shhalahr@beehaw.org 4 points 8 months ago

Oh, I love that metaphor.

[–] Shhalahr@beehaw.org 2 points 8 months ago

Only one punch? Letting them off easy, I see.

[–] Shhalahr@beehaw.org 1 points 9 months ago

I tend to go with the "distract myself" method. Think about some song, movie, game, etc. Keeps the brain from ruminating on that shit. And usually can manage it long enough that the thought's barely a vague memory afterwards.

Basically, the idea is: Don't feed the demon.

[–] Shhalahr@beehaw.org 3 points 9 months ago

Watts was reportedly turned into police by a nurse. Of roughly 1,400 cases where people were criminalized for their pregnancies between 2006 and 2022, one in three cases were instigated by a medical professional, according to an analysis of the cases by the reproductive justice group Pregnancy Justice.

What a motherfucking bunch of evil assholes!

[–] Shhalahr@beehaw.org 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

He added, “A woman’s right to vote is not a ‘sensitive social issue’. It is established law and fact. A board game about historical events from over a century ago is unlikely to ‘impact the outcome of an election or pending legislation’.”

Hey, now and then, I hear the suggestion that women's suffrage should be removed. Sometimes even from women that have totally bought into the patriarchy. Still, as far as I know, that opinion remains far from mainstream (thank goodness).

Honestly, there's still a lot of leftover shit from the Civil War that's still affecting politics. And that's almost 70 years older than the 19th Amendment.

So while I agree that Women's Suffrage is hardly sensitive, age seems to have little to do with it.

[–] Shhalahr@beehaw.org 2 points 10 months ago

The trial that has taken place over the last 44 days has no jury, and Engoron will directly determine the final penalties that will be leveled against the Trump family and its company.

Totally makes sense to verbally attack the one person who will make the decision, right?

[–] Shhalahr@beehaw.org 1 points 10 months ago

So this is what "free speech absolutism" looks like, eh?

view more: next ›