Sibbo

joined 1 year ago
[–] Sibbo@sopuli.xyz 4 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Fair point. But then, would anyone actually care that it is open source? I am not sure if there is a larger target group that would be more inclined to buy a game because of that. Maybe you can use it for marketing though?

[–] Sibbo@sopuli.xyz 5 points 9 months ago (3 children)

If you actually want to make games for a living, then don't do open source. Have people pay for enjoying your work. If it is a hobby, open source may be beneficial, because you can then team up with other hobbyists.

[–] Sibbo@sopuli.xyz 3 points 9 months ago

The optimal phone is both corded and wireless: it has a receiver corded to a base piece with a traditional dial, but the base piece is wireless.

[–] Sibbo@sopuli.xyz 3 points 9 months ago (1 children)

As someone who has not played DRG, was it roguelike as well, or is this now a roguelike spinoff?

[–] Sibbo@sopuli.xyz 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I would think that subscribing to a community could be coupled to a license. Servers do not randomly send data, they only send it to other servers that are subscribed. And a server could technically decline a subscription.

But anyways, by default, copyright is with the creator. No idea what that looks like in legislations around the world, but if I remember correctly, in EU, just because you give a copy of a e.g. song you wrote to someone, does not actually mean they can do with it what they want. By default, you have all the rights, and the someone else needs to grant them to you. So if you give that someone also a contract where it states that he can play it in front of an audience, then they can, otherwise they cannot.

However, I am not sure how much implied consent can play a role here. By posting something on a fediverse instance, since the purpose of the fediverse is to share these posts with other servers, then by posting you may implicitly agree to this data being shared, and the next server can share it with another server again, and so on. This is the basic "boost" functionality of mastodon.

I believe though that because the purpose of the fediverse is not explicitly to train AI models or to sell the posts to someone else, it may be illegal to scrape all posts off to feed e.g. an AI model. But may also not be. We will never know until someone starts doing it and someone else sues them.

[–] Sibbo@sopuli.xyz 1 points 9 months ago

Bittorrent client with builtin tor-like anonymity. It also allows to search its hidden network, so you can find all kinds of stuff. Not that I would use it for piracy though, but it is pretty good for downloading open source software.

[–] Sibbo@sopuli.xyz 5 points 9 months ago (2 children)
[–] Sibbo@sopuli.xyz 5 points 9 months ago (5 children)

Legally, in EU, you probably cannot scrape an instance of someone else because of the database copyright law. But I have no idea if that applies to being part of the network. Since the other instances send you their content willingly.

Maybe someone should make a license extension to ActivityPub, where instances can communicate what can and what can't be done with the information they publish. Then at least there would be legal clarity. If it can be enforced is another question.

[–] Sibbo@sopuli.xyz 3 points 9 months ago

How much is a wind-proof windshield? And do they also offer air-proof tires?

[–] Sibbo@sopuli.xyz 2 points 9 months ago

We gotta rename Earth to Kerbin anyways. I mean, there are gotta be more planets that are made from earth.

[–] Sibbo@sopuli.xyz 16 points 9 months ago (2 children)
[–] Sibbo@sopuli.xyz 3 points 9 months ago

Oppenheimer even had 80 gigs, if I am not mistaken.

view more: ‹ prev next ›