the number of nanometers used to name process nodes (see the International Technology Roadmap for Semiconductors) has become more of a marketing term that has no standardized relation with functional feature sizes or with transistor density (number of transistors per square millimeter).
Pretty interesting, thanks for that link
So we're soon at 3nm, when have we reached the limit of what's possible? An atom is 0.5nm?
tl;dr Crocs think helis are thunderstorms and thunderstorms make crocs horny
That never pans out well (for her)
Maybe this will get the attention of the far right
A lion can't shoot you from hundreds of meters away
I very much doubt that you can run old code unchanged on newer Java versions. Especially not without dependency updates
This problem is not exclusive to Python
early next year
missing in post title
It's called a programming language for a reason
As a professional software engineer, the number of times I actually have to use math skills is pretty low
Even when I worked on a statistical application for lifetime prediction, most of the work wasn't figuring out the correct math
What's leagues more important here is conceptual thinking and being able to model complex human-made constructs in your head