It might allow you to join the clan as a social club, essentially. A fair few of them have newsletters and run events where they get together, so it can be a good network. It doesn't affect the day-to-day life of the average person, though
Skua
Here in Scotland / the UK you'd be absolutely fine so long as you're a decent person. There's not even a language barrier beyond dialect, and dialects vary hugely within the UK and each part of the UK anyway. Just please don't insist that your great-great-grandmother is actually from Clan MacWhatever.
You fool, you're only supposed to post things like that on the Warthunder forums!
As a physically large man who used to work a job that meant he was walking home late at night in the city, just cross the road to overtake. If you're walking that much faster than the other person, you will overtake pretty soon.
They're actually fairly prolific publishers, though I haven't personally played much of their catalogue besides the excellent Golf With Your Friends
I don't think it's necessarily a misleading headline. I don't doubt for a second that Trump would make some meaningless demand with no regard for reality
If you want pausable combat and a logistics focus, the Hearts of Iron games might be interesting to you. They're pseudo-real-time in that things happen on an counter that ticks forward once per in-game hour of the day (so the results of two units fighting, a diplomatic message being sent, construction on a building), but you can speed up, slow down, or pause however you wish. If you want to zip along at a few seconds of real time per day in game, cool. Want to slow things down to a few seconds per in game hour instead? Also fine. Need to pause while you read a description? Also fine.
Seconding Space Marine 2. It's built for three-player co-op, crossplay works smoothly, and it's a super satisfying shooter
Classic ChatGPT there, forgetting two letters and adding in two that weren't there before
I'm pretty sure comparing this spike to the spike from when he actually did drop out is exactly what they intended to do. They're showing that even though this spike exists relative to recent weeks, it's small compared to the number of people who were relatively on the ball.
If you have fact-checked it, why not just say that wherever you did that is where you got the answer from? People are right to be skeptical of "ChatGPT says so", and if you've used it as the start of your research rather than as your entire research then just saying "I asked ChatGPT" is no different to "I googled it", and nobody would much like you saying that either. How you found the information is less important than where you found it.
Then it's no wonder she left