Smash

joined 1 year ago
[–] Smash@lemmy.self-hosted.site 8 points 1 week ago (1 children)

9,3TiByte equate to 10,2TByte. Maybe Ubuntu just rounds up to 11TByte at this point?

[–] Smash@lemmy.self-hosted.site 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I tried it but it's pretty complex compared to tubesync and uses weird af filenames, unusable for media servers

[–] Smash@lemmy.self-hosted.site 2 points 2 months ago (3 children)

I use tubesync, works great

[–] Smash@lemmy.self-hosted.site 2 points 6 months ago

AV1 (NVEnc) + Opus in webm containers

[–] Smash@lemmy.self-hosted.site 2 points 6 months ago

I also use Proxmox Backup Server to backup my VMs. These and the files of my NAS get copied on one of two 22TB HDDs, which I swap out weekly from my fireproof safe. My PC files get synced on my NAS through GoodSync and my Smartphone NeoBackups via Syncthing. My PC also does a Disk2VHD image every month and TrueNAS keeps daily snapshots for two months.

I lost 2TB of data about 15 years ago, I vowed to never let this happen again

[–] Smash@lemmy.self-hosted.site 2 points 7 months ago (2 children)

I hope you are doing 3-2-1 backups now

[–] Smash@lemmy.self-hosted.site 2 points 7 months ago

I have two docker hosts which both run Pihole and get synced via gravity. I set those instances as first and second DNS servers in DHCP and on each docker host

[–] Smash@lemmy.self-hosted.site 1 points 7 months ago

I use a Proxmox Cluster and assigned dedicated NICs to my OPNsense VMs (also clustered). I connected the NIC ports I assigned to the OPNsense VMs directly with a cable and reserved it for CARP usage. I can easily download with 1GB/s and the VMs switch without any packet loss during failover, 10/10 would do it again.

[–] Smash@lemmy.self-hosted.site 12 points 8 months ago

I guess you're from Germany too?

[–] Smash@lemmy.self-hosted.site 7 points 8 months ago (2 children)

ATproto and activityPub aren't compatible are they? So we still need to wait for a bridge.

42
[solved] WireGuard VPN IP Issue (lemmy.self-hosted.site)
submitted 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) by Smash@lemmy.self-hosted.site to c/selfhosted@lemmy.world
 

I tried debugging this issue for hours now but I'm out of ideas. I'm running WireGuard on my OPNsense firewall. It worked flawlessly for about a year but now I've gotten a really strange issue.

Here is the Client config: Client

As you can see, the Client got assigned the IP 10.10.10.11/32

I can ping this IP and the Client can access all Server in the network when connected with the VPN.

BUT when it connects to hosts in the LAN, it doesn't use it's assigned 10.10.10.11 IP but the public IP of the OPNsense firewall instead.

This also doesn't happen every time, but most of the time. I assume that it's perhaps a ARP issue, but I don't know why the OPNsense firewall sends its public IP (WireGuard Endpoint IP) instead of the Clients assigned IP at all.

The IP the Client should use in the LAN (virtual VPN IP): virtual IP

The IP which the Client actually uses (Endpoint IP): Endpint IP

Every help would be greatly appreciated!


EDIT: I removed and re-added the peers in OPNsense and it works again, at least for now. Maybe something broke during an update(?). I will report back if this already fixed the issue (the problem can sometimes be hard to replicate)

EDIT 2: The issue reappeared. But I noticed, that I now have the problem only with Gecko based browsers, chromium works fine (tested on Android).

EDIT 3: The issue only appeared with Gecko based browsers because mine are configured to use some public DOH DNS, which resolved my internal host FQDNs to public IPs, not private ones from the LAN

view more: next ›