Read this for example https://skepticalscience.com/co2-lags-temperature.htm
Sneq
joined 2 years ago
on the scale from my link a million years is like maybe a pixel, so are you sure there were no short periods (50-100 years) when temperature changed rapidly?
Are you sure about that? I’ve read that that the main source of heat / temperature on earth is Sun. CO2 is produced mainly by oceans and it is a derivative of temp. Human activity is responsible for maybe less than a 1% of all CO2 emissions. And this was proven years ago. Also - on the scale from my link a million years is like maybe a pixel, so are you sure there were no short periods (50-100 years) when temperature changed rapidly?
You are right, but also humans exists a bit longer than 150 years. So why limit it to just this short period? To make an impression that somehow we are heating up the planet? It’s just a natural cycle. If we survive it, or how long, is another thing
Why do you limit yourself to just ~150 years. First link from the search: https://scitechdaily.com/66-million-years-of-earths-climate-history-uncovered-puts-current-changes-in-context/
There are some risks involved. But there are much more benefits. I found this study from this video, where all of it is explained in details:
Natural sun exposure is good for our health in many ways and it was proven years ago. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/joim.12496
CO2 lags behind temperature changes, not the other way around. It can later amplify the changes.