Sodis

joined 1 year ago
[–] Sodis@feddit.de 5 points 4 months ago (1 children)

More parties unfortunately does not fix the problem, as you can see by the rise of fascists in nearly all democracies worldwide.

[–] Sodis@feddit.de 6 points 5 months ago

Yeah, apart from transportation it is really the easiest way to have a personal impact on carbon dioxide emissions. If you rent, you can't exchange your heating system, if you use electricity you have no impact on where it comes from and so on.

[–] Sodis@feddit.de 5 points 5 months ago (3 children)

Moving the goalpost much? First it is not the consumers fault, then it is too expensive and now you do not even have time to cook?

[–] Sodis@feddit.de 3 points 5 months ago

It was the historical reason for this rule, yes. In the time people eating pig meat were getting sick, so they put a rule into their religion as a countermeasure.

[–] Sodis@feddit.de 2 points 5 months ago

What about vegetables? If you are talking about plant proteins with not a lot of carbs go for TVP or vegan protein powders.

[–] Sodis@feddit.de 1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

You mean being in need of green energy as soon as possible? I don't see nuclear helping short term.

[–] Sodis@feddit.de 1 points 6 months ago (3 children)

While renewables get build without subsidies, because they pay off anyway.

[–] Sodis@feddit.de 1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Yeah, that's what I also never got. If you have dirt in the kitchen, that's semifluid, no one in their right mind would clean it without wetting it. But for the butt that does not count. I do not have a bidet, but I can reach the faucet from my toilet. So I just wet the toilet paper and produce far less toilet paper waste thanks to this.

[–] Sodis@feddit.de 1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

I mean, it doesn't have to relate to a particle. Lambda is also associated with a property of space itself.

[–] Sodis@feddit.de 2 points 6 months ago (3 children)

The point with the LHC is, that it is very hard to find something, that you are not actively looking for. You have to at least have a certain understanding of the decay channels of the proposed particle to be able to scan the data for it. It's the same problem they have for discovering dark matter particles.

[–] Sodis@feddit.de 3 points 6 months ago

Oh with mainstream science I meant the journalism, probably bad wording.

[–] Sodis@feddit.de 3 points 6 months ago (2 children)

Yeah, but somehow mainstream science gaslit everyone into thinking, that the current model is definitely right, even though there are relevant observations, that are not explained by it. But I guess we just need a new even bigger particle accelerator and then we will definitely find dark matter particles!

view more: next ›