Strykker

joined 1 year ago
[–] Strykker@programming.dev 0 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (3 children)

Except the NAT device will stonewall traffic on every port except the ones I open, for my entire network, and then I can just worry about securing the software listening on those few ports, instead of having to worry about the firewalls on every device I own.

Tldr default nat behavior is a state full firewall.

[–] Strykker@programming.dev 2 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (2 children)

You apparently haven't seen the video of a fsd tesla going full speed through the fog towards a train crossing with an active train.

The cars display didn't even indicate that it thought something was in front of it, and would have happily driven right into the side of this train if the driver hadn't taken over at the last moment. (Driver was an idiot for using fsd in the fog to begin with) but it shows the cameras can't handle reduced visibility well currently, they saw the fog and just decided it was open road or clear sky.

[–] Strykker@programming.dev 5 points 2 months ago (7 children)

Gonna be real here, I'm in tech, there is no fucking way I'm gonna open my PC to the entire fucking internet. Vulnerabilities are everywhere and no code is perfect. Firewalls and nat help stop so many attacks from the start.

Even if ipv6 is common I will assume most implementations will be nat based.

[–] Strykker@programming.dev 1 points 2 months ago

Because the other guy supports hyper genocide.

[–] Strykker@programming.dev 4 points 2 months ago

You probably do, it's still mostly the same architecture under the hood.

[–] Strykker@programming.dev 26 points 2 months ago

Gotta say though it's kinda nice when you run an update to be able to tell ah yes KDE apps are being upgraded when you see the wall of Ks

[–] Strykker@programming.dev 3 points 2 months ago

Technically since it's the Chinese government throwing money at the business that would make them better at socialism than us.

[–] Strykker@programming.dev 1 points 2 months ago

That's what a retrospective is.

[–] Strykker@programming.dev 2 points 3 months ago

The biggest thing would be that a game under playtest is likely to undergo drastic balance changes and potentially even changes to core gameplay, a review of a game in that early of a state would likely not reflect the finished product, and is unlikely to be updated or taken down when the game is released, this possibly poisoning public opinion with content that doesn't reflect the actual game.

[–] Strykker@programming.dev 16 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Sure they don't have any trust from the industry anymore.

It doesn't have to be a legal document for there to be consequences.

[–] Strykker@programming.dev 42 points 3 months ago (6 children)

The so what is that this writer for the verge will likely never be trusted with NDA type pre-release access for any other games going forward, and this may even impact all of the Verge.

This isn't just a one and done kind of issue, this will be seen by the entire industry as a "can't trust that guy with pre-release access"

[–] Strykker@programming.dev 5 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Calling hades trash compared to anything is pretty extreme.

From what I've played hades has a better combat system, cult has a more direct narrative and more non combat stuff to do.

They are both great games, but do have fairly different focuses

view more: ‹ prev next ›