Tartas1995

I hope these aren't real. I, and most people here, could probably write these codes top to bottom on paper without an eraser or strikethrough parts because we have it fully solved before the interviewer finished the sentence.

Not a criticism of you but a little fun fact about him for others, he has a bunch of friends who "aren't" Nazis but calling themselves or have friends who like to call themselves stuff like "race realist".

While I love the meme, Linux is doing pretty good recently

Just In case, I wasn't clear, I am just relaying the argument as I understood it

Following an ideal while being based on free labor is difficult

It doesn't seem to be a debate. "Microkernels are better" "yes but I don't have the time for it" but thanks

Thanks! I will look into

I have heard that before in a joke setting, I would love to hear genuine arguments for and against it.

I tried to express my understanding of the arguments. I don't know and I couldn't argue either case to a point that it is worth adding to the conversation

I understand your point and I want to make clear that my own opinion is not in favor of systemd or against systemd. I am very much neutral. I just expressed my understanding of the arguments. But I welcome the discussion.

The argument is basically that it does too much and as the motto of Unix was basically "make it do 1 thing and that very well", systemd goes against that idea.

You might think it is silly because what is the issue with it doing many things. Arguably, it harms customization and adaptability, as you can't run only 2/3 of systemd with 1/3 being replaced with that super specific optimisation for your specific use case. Additional, again arguably, it apparently makes it harder to make it secure as it has a bigger attack surface.

I don't understand the meme, like what it tries to joke about. the motto of the kernel is to not break userspace, right? So I assume the joke is based on that but I don't see the joke.