Tetsuo

I definitely think people can and WILL get confused by purposefully confusing packaging.

If the law says you can use vegetarian steak the producer will put an ultra large font STEAK and a minuscule "vegetarian" in front.

So laws that ban explicit sentences are absolutely useless and will be avoided in a matter of minutes.

I'm all for french people eating less meat but it will never work by "tricking" the consumers by using meat terms for vegetarian food.

And I'm not gatekeeping the meat words for it. I just think we can easily find new words for vegan products and that's fine and avoid getting misleading products.

Seriously, what is the real-world impact here? Imagine for a second that some miracle vegetarian steak could be confused for a beef one. Why does it matter? Someone might accidentally eat a vegetable?

I'm sorry but you have no issues with a product label being misleading as long it's pushing people to eat vegetables?

Would you have the same opinion if it was an animal steak being sold to you as "Vegan steak" ?

Point is, we don't want misleading names for products. Imo people are actively trying to make this topic a political one when it's a consumer protection issue.

If it's not a steak, call it something else. It will be clearer for the consumer.

Regarding the edit:

As far as I know your bash just tells you the purge commands were run but not if they were successful.

It also seems like the first purge would have removed all strongswan* package anyway so it sounds likely that you attempted to purge strongswan and decided not to. Maybe seeing the things that would be broken at the time you decided to reduce the scope of the great purge of strongswan in 2022 :)

I'm usually pretty relaxed when it comes to disclosure of vulnerabilities but this is the kind of issues where I think it would have been better to privately report the issue to the Lemmy dev and wait ( a long time probably) for it to be fixed before disclosing.

Especially since currently there is multiple people abusing the image hosting feature.

Not a big deal, but sometimes it is actually a better practice to give an opportunity to the dev to fix something before forcing them to do so in a hurry.

In my experience this site works on 10% of the paywalls I encountered. It's better than nothing still but not really a solution.

I would be very curious to see the algorithm adapting to that:

User: click on shrooms ad

AI: Oh he likes shrooms with his cocaine! Let's try a marijuana to snort with his cocaine.

I see so much hate toward Tesla in this post and I assume it's mostly because of Musk.

But at the end of the day they are still the ones selling the most EV which I still believe is a good thing.

I'd rather people buy an asshole's EV than another polluting pick-up truck tbh. (I know EV are also creating pollution, no need to point this out ty).

The vast majority of EVs I see in the street of my french city are Tesla's. And I see a bit more everyday. And no matter how much I despise Musk, I still appreciate the fact that tesla is helping us move forward from combustion engines.

I don't really care if someone buys a Tesla just to show off. It's one less combustion engine on the road.

That's definitely an issue. At what point does copyright applies if you are just helped by an AI ?

I guess the courts will have to decide that...

Output from an AI has just been recently considered as not copyrightable.

I think it stemmed from the actors strikes recently.

It was stated that only work originating from a human can be copyrighted.

If I'm not mistaken AI work was just recently considered as NOT copyrightable.

So I find interesting that an AI learning from copyrighted work is an issue even though what will be generated will NOT be copyrightable.

So even if you generated some copy of Harry Potter you would not be able to copyright it. So in no way could you really compete with the original art.

I'm not saying that it makes it ok to train AIs on copyrighted art but I think it's still an interesting aspect of this topic.

As others probably have stated, the AI may be creating content that is transformative and therefore under fair use. But even if that work is transformative it cannot be copyrighted because it wasn't created by a human.

EA ruin my favorite gaming franchise: Battlefield

Or DICE did under the supervision of the geniuses over at EA.

Now I will never get to play another Battlefield game...

So yeah, it's better to stay away from EA products.