TheButtonJustSpins
I'm lucky to be a millennial - we had typing classes in school. I can touch type.
If they weren't using LLMs to code, I'd mostly agree with that. But projects that put effort into integrating LLMs likely use them as well (as is the case here).
How about one that doesn't use LLMs to code?
Goddamnit. I hope someone forks 2.20.
Because they were talented song writers.
I really like having the disclosure comment pinned for a more nuanced explanation of what, if any, AI went into a project or post. I think just a tag can't capture the levels of AI use.
I'm personally a never-genAI, but, unless we go No AI as a community, I don't think it makes sense to group all projects that touch AI for documentation with all that use it for testing with all that completely let the AI generate all their code, etc. And I don't think setting a threshold for which get tagged makes sense either. Basically, a tag is misleading no matter how it's implemented.
I'll upvote you for the info and the correction, but, in context of the question and questioner, I'm not sure it's relevant.
Are you looking at 3.0, 3.2, 4.0? These are revisions of USB - the higher, the faster.
Do they not want AI autocomplete in the IDE? AI-assisted translation? AI-generated test cases?
I would like no AI anything, yes.
/r/selfhosted has an automod comment that creates a place to disclose how genAI/LLMs were used in the project and the post. I like that.