TheCee

joined 1 year ago
[–] TheCee@programming.dev 2 points 1 year ago

Was it an intended pun?

Unfortunately, no.

[–] TheCee@programming.dev 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Yet I think that had Judaism been more proselytist, it would have gained more followers and, probably, been more fanatical and aggressive.

Yes, that's what I'm counting on, since I assume that ideas like religions take part in a long-term process of evolution. Unfortunately, the most whackiest, edgiest religions seem to be the most fit. Therefore my answer to the top level post.

[–] TheCee@programming.dev 0 points 1 year ago (4 children)

I never said brainwashing children was ok as far as I can recall.

Fair enough, you didn't. I apologize. I lost track of the chain of posters and mixed you up with the first poster who didn't seem to recognize the dangers of passing belief to children.

As for Judaism, I stand by what I said: it’s not proselytist in the way other religions are, trying to convert other people. I don’t judge it as bad or as good, I don’t care. I just state a fact as I’ve seen/read.

That may be case. Which is possibly why, historically speaking, Judaism doesn't seem to be on the winning side. Which is bad, because it means opportunities for more fanatical, agressive religions.

[–] TheCee@programming.dev 2 points 1 year ago (6 children)

That’s not proselytising, it’s a while different thing

I don't see your point. How is brainwashing children ok when wololo-ing people is not? Even from an egocentric perspective, you have to live in a society.

[–] TheCee@programming.dev -2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (8 children)

Pretty sure you can be born into judaism, though. Chances are, it is even the default scenario with even semi-religious parents.

That's not "keeping to yourself" to me. That's like passing the cigarettes to your kids.

[–] TheCee@programming.dev 14 points 1 year ago (11 children)

If religious can keep to themselves

Since religions compete, that doesn't sound feasible.

[–] TheCee@programming.dev 5 points 1 year ago

Or a signal that you'd rather not support the worst way to introduce type systems to frontend dev. While I'm not sure that applies to DHH, I am sure there are other devs that understand compromising all your goals to codepend on Node or even JS itself isn't that much of a win and rather see support for better options.

[–] TheCee@programming.dev 1 points 1 year ago

User Skull giver mentioned https://wiki.openjdk.org/display/wakefield/Work+breakdown, so it seems to be WIP.

 

cross-posted from: https://programming.dev/post/2433863

Hi, does anybody know the state of recent (2020 and onward) FX releases regarding supporting Wayland? Thank you.

 

Hi, does anybody know the state of recent (2020 and onward) FX releases regarding supporting Wayland? Thank you.

[–] TheCee@programming.dev 4 points 1 year ago

Don't usual astronauts have to learn all about celestial mechanics and whatnot? Sounds like the master class to mental gymnastics.

[–] TheCee@programming.dev 6 points 1 year ago

Eh, I'd give it a spin.

"What you got there, Sandy? Ah, another cow-bone that didn't make it on the ark and got encrusted. Hold on.. UMM UMM UMM UMM UMM, there you go, original shape."

 

cross-posted from: https://programming.dev/post/1941671

Details in the link of the headline.

 

cross-posted from: https://programming.dev/post/1890996

(That's the title of this page.)

 

cross-posted from: https://programming.dev/post/1245230

Hi, what is the most primitive programming language (esolangs included) that you can think of or make up that could still be reasonably well^1^ supported by a language server (or similar piece of software)?

1 We have to draw a line somewhere, so I'd figure capabilities

  • highlight semantic errors
  • renaming stuff safely, that is:
    • without confirmation
    • without evaluating parts of the code
  • proper completion (not just best guess)
  • go to definition/show use

I appreciate your answers!

1
A Type System for Scripting ECS (ceesstuff.github.io)
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by TheCee@programming.dev to c/programming@beehaw.org
 

cross-posted from: https://programming.dev/post/1086370

This time on my arbitrary blog: Entity component systems.

Also, highlight.js should degrade more gracefully without JS activated than last time. Note that I can't process syntax highlighting in my build step, because I don't have a build step.

EDIT: improved phrasing

 

cross-posted from: https://programming.dev/post/869062

Let's test if crossposting works this time...

In this poorly written essay I list programming language design features that make dynamically typed languages less dynamic. Stuff I collected over the last few years when people asked about it.

Also, don't worry, next post will be more concise.

view more: next ›