TheFogan

I wouldn't say that... there are indeed scams out there that aren't related to trump... at least not until the scammer gets caught and trump pardons him.

So would be more accurate to say on the ven diagram, the trump circle is completely inside of the scams circle, (though the scams circle is certainly bigger than the trump one).

Pretty sure the flow chart for identifying scams goes.

"Is trump in the name?" With yes leading to "it's a scam"

If they had spines, democrats would be running on "we shut down the government to protect all people from illegal searches under ice. Or to prevent constituents health insurance premiums from shooting up. Meanwhile the republicans shut down the government to protect only themselves from legal investigations".

That's because the joker never was in charge of the federal government.

That being said, I think joker as president would be a nice step up... he's chaotic as hell, but he hates indiscriminately, he explicitly will not work with nazi's (If I recall a crossover had him meet red skull, who he opposed the second he realized he was a real nazi).

True but then it's still worth pointing out the sides disparity... IE democrats sure as hell have had people switch alligences. Within the media sector, half the groups associated with the young turks, went on to become right wing. (Jimmy Dore, Dave Reuben etc...) Politician wise, we've had quite a few flips from democrat to either independent or republican. Yet none of them leave with "Hey here's all the dirt I learned.

The point is I find it most telling that these conspiracy theorists, that are famous for grasping at the thinnest of straws when attacking the left, yet by attacking the right, they demonstrate that they do know what real evidence looks like. Basically to me that's a showing of the question of are they actually crazy, or are they grifters.

Ever notice how when the conspiracy nuts attack the right, they bring receipts, actual recordings, solid evidence. Then she goes for the left with like the absurd Macron conspiracy where her evidence is basically "this girl looks a bit like her brother... nevermind the fact that he's been in public many times since the claim started etc...

It's about the feeling of safety. I mean could you imagine how terrifying it must feel just walking around a school, dragging a kicking and screaming 10 year old out and think to yourself... what if one of these kids has a gun and starts shooting! We all see it on the news every day... but it's so much easier to watch when it's just little kids trying to get about their day getting shot. It hits so much harder when it's 30 year old trained gunmen that might have to face being in the line of fire.

Or walking down the street just minding your business spraying pepper spray in peoples faces, and think to yourself, what if someone in this crowd has a gun. I'm only wearing 3 layers of body armor, and I've only got 15 friends around also armed with large assault rifles, gas masks, and tear gas to protect myself, maybe one person in this crowd, might have a weapon somewhere, and might even think about using it.

Or imagine the fear they feel every time they burst down someones door, with only 10 other soldiers, and a mere inches of riot shield in front of them to protect them from these people that have a small chance of owning a firearm somewhere in the house, these brave souls need protection!

I can't imagine what it's like to live in that kind of fear.

He's already announced investigation into her hasn't he? Claiming her wealth increase when she married a rich dude is suspicious?

Actually I imagine the biggest thing of the "protection money" racket concept... to my understanding that requires being the most dangerous thing in the area. While the obvious concept of protection money is it's to prevent the group you are paying from robbing you... it is kind of protection in the sense that a small time crook wants to rob stores in a mafia controlled area, the mob will go after him.

I'd imagine an army sized groups breaking down doors etc... means paying the mob ain't that good of a deal.

Also I'd say... I'm pretty sure most organized crime, has their own code of morals. Ice thug may be outside many of their standards.

Would TRUE capitalism have any problems?

Well only a TRUE Scottsman could tell you how TRUE capitalism works.

But OK so in short the gist of theory in capitalism.

Free market ideas - IE capitalism with no government oversite. If a company makes shitty products, someone else will make a less shitty product and all consumers will switch, or if a company starts dumping toxic waste into the drinking water, people would figure it out and stop buying that product... Parts of it are kind of a pipe dream because, some products are inherantly expensive to get started in. Lets face it, Facebook, Windows etc... aren't dominant because their products are the best, pretty sure you could poll their userbase and find abysmal satisfaction among them. Yet even a giant as big as google, can't accomplish the resources needed to compete in those markets... let alone a startup out of nowhere.

Now regulations obviously that's where crony vs regulated comes up in discussion.

Obviously to me the big part is, safety matters. First off the bat, information, consumers can't even make decisions if they don't know. If you are putting poison in food, or calling something healthy when it's loaded with crap, consumers have to know that.

Environmental is a bigger problem. Obviously requiring you to shield and not leak toxins into the drinking water... is a big problem, and it creates a huge problem, as the companys selling gas, or manufacturing chemicals etc... that spend less on safety are at a huge advantage in pricing to the consumer, who can't tell why the more ethical companies are so expensive, only that they are more expensive. But the more safety that's required, the higher the bar to entry is..

You have rights this is america *

• Rights should be exercised at your own risk... Courts may change their rulings on them at any time, and not even the best lawyer on earth can revive after you've been shot in the head.

I mean DNS is always the issue... but then that's kind of the double edged sword as well isn't it?

Conceptually 4 options come to mind.

1. DNS as current - weakness domain name changes or DNS outages or poisoning

2. IP address - Issues, migration etc... some instances may need to move services etc....

3. SSL private/public keys - probably the strongest I'd imagine. only real weakness I can see is... 1. it has no ability to find a server, and I guess if a server is hacked and it's private key is stolen, federated servers would not be able to spot the imposter.

I do think 3 might be the strongest option. I don't know anything on how lemmy etc.. works. I'd imagine a strategy would be, When A and B federate with eachother, A records B's Domain name, IP, and public key (and B gets A's as well), if DNS goes down attempt recorded IP. If neither work wait for an incoming connection and if the new connections public key matches an existing public key, it assumes the identity.

But as far as the user side I don't really know. Obviously we can only match users as their domains. I can't imagine how I could find you again with gammaray@sh.itjust.works when sh.itjust.works domain is unregistered.