Tibert

joined 2 years ago
[–] Tibert@compuverse.uk 3 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

Well tesla has been publicised in multiple places as having bad quality control.

So maybe I could also guess that they cut out some design costs on some models, which may not include battery protection because they would in most cases not get in contact with water.

[–] Tibert@compuverse.uk 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children)

Maybe all brands, but can't be sure.

Tesla is "known" or at lest publicised in multiple places that they have pretty bad quality control, and I guess also bad design on some parts.

So bad protection on the battery at tesla design? Maybe? Is there a "review" on car internals somewhere? I have no idea.

Could another vehicle survive the same thing? Who knows, maybe? Maybe not?

Tho there are some who said they went with a tesla directly into water slashing over the hood. So maybe some are waterproof?

[–] Tibert@compuverse.uk 7 points 2 years ago (1 children)

This is very old news. But I guess it's never too late to make a copy article for advertising...

[–] Tibert@compuverse.uk 6 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Good thing there are tools for viewing old versions of a website (wayback machine for example). At least if there is a snapshot at the time where the comment was not deleted.

And add ons as webarchive allowing easy access to all those tools.

[–] Tibert@compuverse.uk 6 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I think this is either very not well understood or I am missing an old brace news.

They did not alter any link.

They however were proposing an auto complete, when the user was typing a crypto currency website name, with their affiliate link. https://brave.com/referral-codes-in-suggested-sites/.

They did not modify any link the user imput without autocomplete or through a search engine. (also it's fixed).

Maybe I'm mistaken you are talking of something else.

[–] Tibert@compuverse.uk 4 points 2 years ago

I don't know if that loophole may work. But if it does, it may work only for a time until a consumer association escalates that to the European court of justice.

[–] Tibert@compuverse.uk 1 points 2 years ago

May just be a way to compromise your account.

Do NOT try it.

[–] Tibert@compuverse.uk 2 points 2 years ago

Amazon is as you said extremely efficient on their warehouse and shipping because of their centralization and size. They can build extremely expensive warehouse to keep being efficient and surpass the competition.

There would maybe be possible to get an "enhanced" activity pub in order to protect privacy and financial informations. There is already something similar but without activity pub : a multitude of website where it is possible to buy things.

But there still needs to be some centralization, either through the postal service for small companies, or through centralised warehouse companies, with spzcialized equipments. And both of these things are already in place.

However if the OP wants a decentralized Amazon like efficiency, it won't happen. The costs will increase and it will take more time, because the way the shipment will work will heavily depend on the seller.

view more: ‹ prev next ›