TimLovesTech

joined 1 year ago

I feel like although possible now, that this may need to change going forward since I'm not sure how Amazon can validate your review if not done through their platform.

This of course fragments reviews to specific retail storefronts, but if the platform can't validate at least the fact you purchased the item I don't see anyway they can even begin to know you're leaving a legit review.

[–] TimLovesTech@badatbeing.social 2 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I don't see a link for this, but found the github page for Mentions United.

[–] TimLovesTech@badatbeing.social 1 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

But as stated during the trial, the reason he wanted to hide the Stormy stuff was to protect his campaign. So by making a deal with National Enquiry to catch and kill the story to protect his campaign, not his family, means it was a campaign finance violation because he tried to do it on the DL instead of declaring it the legal way.

And you're right that paying someone to stay silent isn't illegal (as long as the thing you're having them stay silent about itself is legal), but doing it in furtherance of his campaign without properly reporting it is illegal. So pretending it's just a casual falsified business records case is downplaying the election interference by trying to hide payouts to protect his campaign bid (electability).

Edit - it was the 2nd crime (election interference) that made each count a felony instead of a misdemeanor.

[–] TimLovesTech@badatbeing.social 2 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (3 children)

Well if you take a company like Amazon they know everything about you already, including if you actually purchased the item you are reviewing. And that should be a simple first "hurdle" for a reviewer to be legit. They already have a way of sorting them out and labeling them in place. So I would assume this means if you don't have that label your review doesn't go live. They can then add more qualifiers to prove they know the reviewers are real, since this seems to put the onus of proof on the company not that FTC.

Edit - some words

Yeah, I think for 99% of people tech has really stopped evolving and we have allowed corporate bean counters to lock shit down and then abandon it. When the nerds ran the show we had innovation and constant improvement of a product because technology is awesome. Then capitalism killed it. Now you get a cool car with a shit infotainment system outdated and never updated the day you take delivery, when we could have some crazy shit with badass HUDs and sensors for everything. We could make it harder for assholes on the road to try and kill everyone. We could make all cars in the area aware of the road hazard driving 45 in a 55 during rush hour. None of that stuff makes the line graph go up though, so we wait for the next nerd with money and a desire to create the future.

[–] TimLovesTech@badatbeing.social 22 points 3 weeks ago

I see articles like this stating he has donated $0 and doesn't intend to contribute anything. He also calls out Musk for what he is doing.

According to OpenSecrets.org, which tracks campaign financing, Cuban last donated to a candidate in 2002, when he gave $1,000 to Democratic California Congresswoman Zoe Lofgren's campaign.

[–] TimLovesTech@badatbeing.social 28 points 3 weeks ago

Things like this are their goal when they use buzz words like relaxed regulation, "small government", and "free market".

[–] TimLovesTech@badatbeing.social 1 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Has someone posted an argument, or do you in the future see yourself seeing an argument with someone on here taking the side of "alternative facts" and letting that change your mind? If not then it's just someone likely downvoted to the bottom that people will ignore anyways, not worth the time to post it. I think something like Facebook works for these types of things better, as the population is generally older and more likely to see and reshare just any nonsense true or not.

Because I personally don't see the fediverse as a great medium for trying to bring people into the cult, and the ability to bring people out of the cult is even less likely online, fediverse or not.

[–] TimLovesTech@badatbeing.social 33 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

The original Facebook was just "hot or not" for a college campus, and required invites.

[–] TimLovesTech@badatbeing.social 4 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I used to do this as a kid, and would add cheese to make it a "sandwich".

[–] TimLovesTech@badatbeing.social 28 points 3 weeks ago

And the best part is that unlike most politicians, where a team needs to dig into their past to try and find something, Trump is saying the quiet part out loud daily.

[–] TimLovesTech@badatbeing.social 24 points 3 weeks ago (4 children)

Let's just listen to music. Lets make it into a musical. Who the hell wants to hear questions, right?

  • Trump (who was exhausted after 4 questions)
view more: ‹ prev next ›