Tinidril

The one silver lining is that Trump voters are about to face reality in a way would never otherwise have to deal with. I really wish that took the edge off, but it really doesn't. The impacts of this election will be horrific to everyone, even those who will profit in the short term from the graft and corruption.

That's totally fair, but I think that serious issues with Second Thought's philosophy should be understood when viewing any of his material.

I also wasn't talking about Democrats failing to get things done. That's a small part of it, but it's mostly about who they are, how they message, and who they listen to. If the Democrats achieved everything they set out to do, I seriously doubt the situation with income inequality would be any better. In fact, Democratic initiatives have often made it significantly worse.

I think we all benefited from Bernie's runs in 2016 and 2020 resulting in a marked change to Democratic party philosophy, but it's not nearly the change the Democrats needed to be able to effectively message in the world we live in.

https://youtu.be/-vjnOc5UBbU?si=1BSAWSwJhUSyDDe5

That's what 50+ years of neoliberalism does to a population. It's a world wide phenomenon.

The Democrats are responsible for 50+ years of neglecting working Americans that created the culture you're complaining about.

It's truly embarrassing as hell to have a Democratic party that can't absolutely crush a clown like Trump. The Democratic establishment isn't just out of touch, it's weak as fuck. Yes, this is on Kamala, but it's also on Obama, and the Clintons, and Pelosi, and Schumer, and the whole "anyone but Bernie" coalition. This is the consequence of running to the center instead of tackling wealth inequality head on.

I believe there has already been one instance in this election of a Trump vote from a dead voter.

Reporting on anything related to Epstein is almost non-existent because of all the powerful people that are vulnerable.

It amazes me that so many people are oblivious to how far things have moved towards the right and towards authoritarianism over the past 50 years. Sure, we've inched forwards on a handful of social issues, but corporate power, the prison system, the military industrial complex, privacy rights, and the social safety net are all in much worse shape today than 50 years ago. "The era of big government is over" came from Bill Clinton, not Reagan or Bush. Income inequality has soared thanks to both Republican and Democratic policy. Republicans have been worse by a long shot, but they both have moved us in the same direction.

We need to make the case that Kamala is better than Trump for Palestine, and do it without demonizing those on the fence. They need to understand that their voices will continue to be heard when the election is over, and a whole lot of the rhetoric being aimed at them says just the opposite, or at least implies it. "Let's elect Kamala so we can continue to fight for Palestine" instead of "Palestine has to take a back seat to all these other issues."

Unfortunately the Democrats need slightly more than a bare majority because some Democrats might as well be Republicans.

Kamala has also stated her support for exempting this legislation from the filibuster, something Biden didn't do. She wouldn't technically have the power herself, but might get Senate Democrats on board.

Virginia isn't really in play, and the number of votes in question won't change that. I've got a bad feeling that this ruling was intended to serve a larger purpose than is immediately obvious. Perhaps a signal to state courts in other states? There is another shoe.