Tinidril

joined 2 years ago
[–] Tinidril@midwest.social 2 points 4 weeks ago

When it's an inexpensive product that nobody ever has a reason to buy twice yet remains an ongoing cost for the company? (They keep the data available for review and continue to update it with useful information as knowledge of genetic traits and lineages grows). That's not a way to build an ongoing cash flow to cover expenses. Especially when all the people inclined to be interested have already purchased.

[–] Tinidril@midwest.social 10 points 4 weeks ago

Shit, Oracle was down in the low $400B range in May. Apparently being evil pays well in the current administration.

[–] Tinidril@midwest.social 16 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago) (8 children)

A little searching finds only one company that really fits the bill. Costco has a market cap of $433B and had a reported $14.8B cash on hand as of May 11. That's an interesting possibility that I wouldn't have guessed. Costco is less evil than most big corporations, so that's a little hopeful if I got it right.

Oracle comes close with a market cap of $583B. That's indeed over $400B, but that would make the description a bit weird. In any case, Oracle makes more sense from a business angle. Unfortunately, they are near the top of the evil scale.

[–] Tinidril@midwest.social 11 points 4 weeks ago (6 children)

It's not a great business model if you think about it. Customers pay a small fee once then never again.

[–] Tinidril@midwest.social 3 points 1 month ago

In the US police would probably fire back with real guns, or charge them with domestic terrorism. To be fair, we do have a lot of cunts in this country that would load the guns up with acid, piss, or American beer - but I repeat myself.

[–] Tinidril@midwest.social 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

You just had a comment in this thread

Mods will mod. I don't think that comment should have been removed, but I'm not going to protest it.

You trying to get your comments removed for slapfighting too or what?

I'll go with "what". I'm not sure the mods will penalize me for not following your commands.

let it go

It may go whenever it wants.

[–] Tinidril@midwest.social 4 points 1 month ago (3 children)

You don't get to decide when others disengage, only yourself. If you don't want more replies, just stop commenting.

[–] Tinidril@midwest.social 2 points 1 month ago (5 children)

What is this, an Abbott and Costello bit? The words in a sentence are important - all of them. There are differences between people being for violence (as if that's a thing), people recognizing that violence is sometimes necessary, people thinking that violence is appropriate in response to this issue, and people calling for violence. Those all mean different things. Maybe you throw them all in the same mental bucket, but they are not the same. This is a symptom of thinking in thought terminating cliches. That used to be a Republican thing, but its sad how often I'm seeing it now on the left.

And I disagree.... You and I are not going to agree on the violence thing.

Which is fine. There is nothing wrong with us disagreeing on that. The problem is when you mix that in with accusations that I (and others) support violence in cases where we don't, or claim we are calling for violence in response to this incident when we have done no such thing.

Please disengage from this conversation.

Sure, I have no doubt that you can keep it going all by yourself. You really don't need me for it.

[–] Tinidril@midwest.social 4 points 1 month ago (9 children)

What does "violence is not the answer" exactly mean? I see several people pointing out that it sometimes is the answer. I don't see anyone calling for violence as a reaction to this incident, which is what you claimed.

[–] Tinidril@midwest.social 1 points 1 month ago (11 children)
[–] Tinidril@midwest.social 13 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Current New York Post headline: Former appointee of Tim Walz sought in ‘politically motivated assassination’ of lawmaker and husband

view more: ‹ prev next ›