Tiny_Nobody6

joined 10 months ago
[–] Tiny_Nobody6@alien.top 1 points 10 months ago

IYH kindly post the paper link

[–] Tiny_Nobody6@alien.top 1 points 10 months ago

IYH see what size models this targets (spoiler: local will be fine for a couple of years at least) https://www.reddit.com/r/LocalLLaMA/comments/17k7obo/biden_executive_order_regulates_very_large_models/

[–] Tiny_Nobody6@alien.top 1 points 10 months ago

IYH IMHI the logic is a modern cloaking of an old logic paradox of Zeno that motion cannot exist.

Zeno of Elea, a follower of Parmenides, presented several examples intended to show that motion is impossible:

  1. The paradox of Achilles: Suppose Achilles is chasing a tortoise. However, the tortoise will always reach a point ahead of Achilles before he can reach it.
  2. The arrow in flight: Suppose an arrow is moving. However, to get from one point to another, it must first reach the halfway point, and then the halfway point of the halfway, and so on. Thus motion is impossible.

Zeno argued that these paradoxes show that motion is self-contradictory and therefore impossible. He aimed to support the doctrine of his teacher Parmenides that only being exists as one, and that motion cannot exist.

The paradoxes question the very possibility of motion, change or plurality. They seem to suggest that for any period of time - however short - and any distance in space - however small - motion cannot be completed since reaching the end of the period or distance would require traversing an infinite number of intermediate points or moments.

So in summary, Zeno used paradoxical arguments to claim that the concept of motion leads to contradictions, and therefore motion must be an illusion and can have no reality. This was an attempt to support Parmenides' view that reality is a single, changeless, and unified whole.

[–] Tiny_Nobody6@alien.top 1 points 10 months ago

IYH using u/stunspot AI bot Universal Evaluator gives 70/100 points

As a Universal Evaluator with expertise in blockchain technology, I will evaluate the idea of using a blockchain-like system where the process of mining trains a decentralized model. I will use a 1-100 point scoring system to rate the merits of this idea.

Scoring breakdown:

  1. Conceptualization (30 points): The idea of utilizing a blockchain-like system for training a decentralized model is intriguing. It combines the benefits of decentralized consensus and collaborative mining efforts to improve the model's training process.

  1. Feasibility (40 points): The feasibility of this idea depends on several factors. Firstly, the technical implementation of integrating a decentralized model training process into a blockchain-like system needs to be carefully designed and implemented. Secondly, ensuring the scalability and efficiency of the system is crucial, as training a model requires significant computational resources. Finally, addressing the challenge of obtaining and appending training data in a decentralized manner is a critical aspect that needs further consideration.

  1. Potential Benefits (30 points): The proposed system has the potential to provide benefits such as enhanced security and immutability through the use of blockchain technology. It can also promote collaboration and incentivize participation through the mining process. Additionally, the decentralized nature of the system could make it resistant to censorship and single-point failures.

Based on the evaluation, I would assign a score of 70 out of 100 to this idea.

Improvement Recommendation:

While the idea shows promise, there are some aspects that need further refinement. Addressing the challenge of obtaining and appending training data in a decentralized manner is a crucial consideration. Additionally, it would be beneficial to explore potential use cases and evaluate the scalability and efficiency of the proposed system. Conducting a thorough analysis of the potential risks and limitations associated with adopting this approach would also be valuable.

In summary, the idea of using a blockchain-like system for training a decentralized model is intriguing, but it requires further development and considerations to ensure its feasibility and practicality.

Should the idea be improved?

Yes, the idea should be improved to address the challenges mentioned above and to further refine the concept. This will help enhance its feasibility and potential benefits.