TrainsAreCool

joined 1 year ago
[–] TrainsAreCool@lemmy.one 48 points 1 week ago

Fuck you, Jeff.

[–] TrainsAreCool@lemmy.one 10 points 4 months ago (1 children)

AI, at it again.

[–] TrainsAreCool@lemmy.one 3 points 4 months ago

I mean, why not both?

[–] TrainsAreCool@lemmy.one 27 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Soon-to-be former doctor.

But I doubt that will make him regret what he did. He'll probably blame the "woke leftists" for "silencing him".

[–] TrainsAreCool@lemmy.one 5 points 4 months ago

The final hilarity would be Elon forcing Twitter to re-enable SMS based tweets, then hackers using it to fake tweets from Elon himself.

[–] TrainsAreCool@lemmy.one 1 points 5 months ago

It's one happy meal, Ellen. What could it cost, $25?

[–] TrainsAreCool@lemmy.one 5 points 6 months ago

That way, in a few years, they can announce a bigger commitment for positive PR that they have no intention of keeping.

[–] TrainsAreCool@lemmy.one 61 points 6 months ago (2 children)

"Corporate commitments to environmental problems turn out to just be fluff for positive PR"

[–] TrainsAreCool@lemmy.one 1 points 7 months ago

Someone told them the problem was just "too many variables", so they figured by taking away sensors, there are fewer variables. Therefore, better self-driving.

[–] TrainsAreCool@lemmy.one 3 points 7 months ago (1 children)

It's still nowhere near any standard we should expect to trust this technology, which is a flawed solution to a problem that doesn't really exist.

[–] TrainsAreCool@lemmy.one 37 points 7 months ago (17 children)

I believe a huge chunk of Tesla's valuation is based on their automation tech, despite having very little real success towards full automation. So they have to focus on that and try to prove they can deliver.

But I'm guessing they won't succeed, as there are fundamental flaws with the technology itself, that can't be solved by throwing more sensors at the problem.

[–] TrainsAreCool@lemmy.one 31 points 7 months ago

It was a crisis a decade ago...

view more: next ›