Tryptaminev

joined 7 months ago
[–] Tryptaminev@lemm.ee 3 points 4 months ago (2 children)

I always found that deeply problematic. Here is some obscure path to follow to set some obscure value where half of the naming does not indicate what exactly you are doing there. Also if you don't set the data-type exactly it wont work. For a fucking 0 or 1 off/on value flag.

[–] Tryptaminev@lemm.ee 2 points 4 months ago (1 children)

I had none of these issues and i don't know what you are talking about.

If you install programs through your package manager they come with a start-menu entry just as easily findable as in Windows. If you don't install programs with an installer in Windows you get the same problem.

Also mounting HDDs made its content accessible to all my programs so far, without any issue. I think you must have chosen extremely obscure distros or fucked things up by yourself during install processes.

[–] Tryptaminev@lemm.ee 3 points 4 months ago

I remember an article from last year or so that German washing machines ended up being sold to Russia through Kazakhstan and other places where they stripped the microchips to repurpose them in their missiles.

https://time.com/6226484/russia-appliance-imports-weapons/

[–] Tryptaminev@lemm.ee 0 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Do people take their waste to a football match and burn it there?

[–] Tryptaminev@lemm.ee 2 points 4 months ago

Food is also consumption. But without food people die, so this consumption directly contributes to keeping the value of the economy up by keeping the workforce alive.

As for the poo safely removing it in WWTPs also costs more money than what can be recovered in energy or hopefully phosphate in the near future. Also the capital investments are significant and as they age and need replacement this value is also gone.

However the alternative is people dying of Cholera and other shitty diseases en masse, so both the investments as well as the expenditures are well spent.

[–] Tryptaminev@lemm.ee -2 points 4 months ago

Again looking at the map of Germany as well as the article from the BBC stating an increase of Microplastic by over 1000% compared to the baseline shows that fireworks are a very strong additional pollutant.

People in the US drive their cars all the time. During rush hour more cars are emitting in traffic jams than are driving to a football match. Yet we see these huge spikes in pollution when there is fireworks.

Think about it: Everything form a firewokr that does not turn into CO2 will stay dispersed in the air or fall down as debris. This is most of it, as the op pointed out himself the GHGs to be only a small part. Meanwhile for cars the vast vast vast majority of its emissions in quantitative terms are CO2 emissions, with particles, NOX and Microplastics being much less. They also pose a massive problem, but because of hundreds of millions of cars on the road every day.

[–] Tryptaminev@lemm.ee -1 points 4 months ago

What represents the value of money? What you can buy with it. What determines what you can buy with it? The total capital stock available and the services offered through labor.

This part of the capital stock is gone. Literally into smoke.

Money is not some abstract independent entity. Its value is directly linked to the real production of the real economy.

[–] Tryptaminev@lemm.ee -4 points 4 months ago (5 children)

i am quite certain that people do not emit particles or NOx like this. In particular nobody is just exhaling heavy metals.

https://www.bbc.com/future/article/20240703-how-4-july-fireworks-pollute-the-air-and-might-damage-your-health

Here is a map for New Years in Germany with a nice slider. Particle concentration increases up to 1000x the base-value of that day (which already includes people setting off fireworks earlier)

https://gis.uba.de/website/silvester/

Unless it is normal for people at football games to ignite pyrotechniques, or they all smoke 5 packs of cigarettes each during the game, there is nothing that would make a comparable pollution.

[–] Tryptaminev@lemm.ee 10 points 4 months ago (7 children)

Yes they are. Somebody extracted the ressources. Somebody processed them into materials. Now someone put them together into the pyrotechniques and finally someone set it off.

All of this labor and capital usage went into creating a short display of pretty lights and bangs, of which afterwards nothing but smoke and memories remain. This is the purest consumption in the economic sense.

Compare that with people using that labor to produce cars instead. Those cars take years before needing renewal and they can be used productively, so they are investments in the economic sense.

Finally lets take clothes, while also consumption they address an immediate human need and are reuseable for some time, so while they are also consumption they are quite different form fireworks.

[–] Tryptaminev@lemm.ee 20 points 4 months ago (7 children)

The problem is pollution, not GHG emissions. Particles, NOx, Plastic debris...

On top of that your local fauna is not at all prepared for the nosie and light pollution.

[–] Tryptaminev@lemm.ee 0 points 4 months ago

Are you a career politician? Do you have 40 years of experience on how exactly not to do this? Does your work require a particular emphasis on knowing how to behave with a camera on you half of the day?

[–] Tryptaminev@lemm.ee 5 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

During off years? So the invasion of Crimea and the "civil war" in Donetzk and Luhansk are "off years" for you?

It is clear now that you don't give a shit about Ukraine.

view more: ‹ prev next ›