Ullallulloo

Yeah, SCOTUS can't remove a candidate for insurrection. The only way is if Congress passes a law describing who is.

Yeah

More like states rights only apply when not delegated to the United States by the Constitution. They should really have written that down somewhere.

The Constitution says "The Congress shall have power to enforce, by appropriate legislation, the provisions of this article." SCOTUS isn't ignoring the Constitution for once.

In practice it doesn't matter. If he makes a shell company, the state can seize/lien his ownership thereof and then force a sale of the property anyway.

Then also split California and Illinois and New York and Georgia and Florida

This only applies to the Wrongful Death of a Minor Act, so if the parents agree, it's legal.

While true, this is just a New York Supreme Court decision. He can still appeal to the Appellate Division then to the New York Court of Appeals. I can't imagine he'll get it turned over, but there's a chance the amount might be lowered or something.

Uh, I don't think New York law provides for debtors' prisons anymore. Those went out of style in the 1700s.

The way a court actually handles an unpaid judgment is it just orders the seizure of any property the debtor does own. It doesn't need permission.

I mean, they released the evidence. It's pretty impossible to deny he's a terrorist unless you're sticking your head in the sand.

This is the opinion column.

Here's the actual article on this event.

What does the government do with all the extra revenue? Theoretically it should be able to reduce other taxes proportionally so that those with low carbon usage come out ahead instead of just being a negative for everyone.