Unquote0270

joined 2 years ago
[–] Unquote0270@programming.dev 22 points 1 month ago

It's baffling that anyone reads their articles, let alone posts them as a basis for debate on a scientific topic.

[–] Unquote0270@programming.dev 15 points 1 month ago

Not a movie but The Handmaid's Tale.

[–] Unquote0270@programming.dev 3 points 2 months ago

Definitely lichess. It makes it very obvious how much of desperate cash cow chesscom is.

[–] Unquote0270@programming.dev 14 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

They just banned pretty much all nsfw subs because of a "bug", including abuse support subs. Probably due to that.

And there was the white people twitter ban, as well as some Musk critical subs a day or two before the"bug".

[–] Unquote0270@programming.dev 13 points 5 months ago

Seems a lot of people share this view that somehow he's for the little guy, despite quite clearly being for the opposite. It's the same over the pond, there's a paranoia held by many that the government is out to persecute the common people. Very strange on both sides, it's almost Orwell levels of Newspeak.

[–] Unquote0270@programming.dev 2 points 6 months ago

You're too funny

[–] Unquote0270@programming.dev 20 points 8 months ago (4 children)

What does atomic mean in this sense? That seems more confusing than immutable.

[–] Unquote0270@programming.dev 3 points 10 months ago (5 children)

Is the three musketeers really on par with the count? I've been meaning to read it for months but I always got the sense it would be disappointing.

[–] Unquote0270@programming.dev 2 points 10 months ago

All of HP Lovecraft's stories.

[–] Unquote0270@programming.dev 2 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

I liked it until about half way through, it seemed to lose all the intrigue and then there was the weird bit about rape (if I remember correctly) at which point I gave up. Shame because it started well.

[–] Unquote0270@programming.dev 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Your assessment of probability is speculation and I didn't suggest you meant "always".

[–] Unquote0270@programming.dev 10 points 10 months ago (2 children)
 

I'm just trying out Immich and I'm really impressed, seems to be exactly what I'm looking for except for one thing. I am looking for something that is a central library for my family so we can all access the same photos and all upload to the same place.

It looks like users can see other users' libraries but you lose the People functionality and perhaps a few other things.

What's the best solution? I'm thinking of just creating a generic user and giving the details for everyone to use but it seems a shame to lose the user functionality of individual passwords etc.

view more: next ›