VikingHippie

joined 1 year ago
[–] VikingHippie@lemmy.wtf -4 points 10 months ago (6 children)

I know why media (say they) use "alleged" all the time, but this doesn't apply.

It's by definition a link. Whether it’s a significant link is another matter, but no court would be so ridiculous as to accept a lawsuit based on a misunderstanding of what the word "linked" means.

if they're on the list, that could be argued it's not alleged that they're tied together in some form

The list itself is a link. Whether it’s a link that means anything is yet to be revealed, but it's beyond a shadow of a doubt and in every legal sense a link.

this will keep anyone from attempted to sue them over it.

No it won't. There was already precisely zero risk of it.

The only thing they're achieving by adding "alleged" to this headline is to annoy people who know what words and concepts are and then spur a lot of people to tell those already annoyed people things the annoyed people already know and have been reminded of every time they've pointed out misuse of "alleged".

[–] VikingHippie@lemmy.wtf 12 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (3 children)

This country has been anti immigrant(anti anyone not white moving here) since it's inception

Nah, until 1882, there was literally no restrictions for anyone moving to the US. If you could afford the journey or even successfully stow away on a ship or train or whatever, they'd let you in and let you stay.

When it came to CITIZENSHIP, though, you're right about the criteria being super racist from day one.

[–] VikingHippie@lemmy.wtf 0 points 10 months ago (12 children)

Nothing "allegedly" about it, they ARE linked. Whether or not they did anything wrong (and they almost certainly did), being mentioned in those court documents is literally a link to Epstein.

You'd think that someone writing for NPR would at least be literate enough to understand what all the words they use mean..

[–] VikingHippie@lemmy.wtf 13 points 10 months ago

edit 326-343 are completely redacted.

Probably implicates politicians and/or their owner donors. Can't have the peasants know the atrocities of their lords.

[–] VikingHippie@lemmy.wtf 4 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (3 children)

Calling Biden "corrupt right wing reactionary" is untrue.

He was known as The Senator From MBNA for shamelessly acting as if he was working for the then second largest credit card company in the country rather than the US people.

He championed the pro-corporate bankruptcy reform that was so anti-consumer that it inspired Elizabeth Warren to advocate for a Consumer Financial Protection Bureau to shield consumers from similarly predatory practices by the rich and powerful.

He's said that "of course" he'd be more likely to agree to talk to someone if they first donated a lot of money to his campaign.

He's repeatedly championed cutting medicare and medicaid.

He initially opposed desegregation bussing, saying he didn't want his kids to "grow up in a racial jungle"

He's bragged about his close cooperation with such segregationists as racism end boss Strom Thurmond.

He has said that he would veto Medicare For All if congress passed a bill allowing any version of it.

He was the only 2020 Dem primary candidate that categorically ruled out decriminalization of the use and possession of cannabis.

He is one of the staunchest international supporters of a fascist government currently engaged in a horrendous genocide because "they've always been our allies, so we need to support them no matter what"

He used to brag that nobody in Washington went to more of the events of that fascist government's lobbying arm, AIPAC.

If that doesn't "paint the picture of" a corrupt right wing reactionary to you, that's not because he isn't one.

I just think that accusation is inflammatory and baseless

Well you're half right. It IS inflammatory. Unpopular truths tend to be.

It would be more helpful to use accurate descriptors.

Those are 100% accurate descriptors. They don't encompass ALL of what he is, but corrupt, right wing and reactionary is objectively three things that he is.

asked for the DEA to review a proposal to reschedule marijuana

A proposal that concluded with no qualifications that rescheduling would be the only defensible course of action. Nothing to review unless he disagrees and wants the war on drugs people to justify it for him.

acquitted existing inmates on marijuana charges

That's prescribing an aspirin for a migraine while you have but refuse to use the cure for the underlying disease.

forgiven as much student loan debt as he is able without intervention from Congress.

Categorically untrue. It's within the constitutional powers of his secretary of education to cancel literally all of it, which he would have done had Biden asked.

Biden knew that he'd get pushback from the GOP no matter how much or how little was forgiven and chose small amounts that he still means tested to death, like Dem leadership always do when they do anything that helps regular people more than their owner donors.

To reiterate: yes, he's objectively corrupt. Yes he's objectively right wing, and yes, he's objectively reactionary.

[–] VikingHippie@lemmy.wtf 11 points 10 months ago

You know how neoliberals and their propaganda machine be..

[–] VikingHippie@lemmy.wtf 9 points 10 months ago (3 children)

Ever heard of the saying "don't cut off your nose to spite your face"?

What you're suggesting is like getting an NFL kicker to kick you in the balls as hard as he can to spite the yoga mom trying to slap you.

[–] VikingHippie@lemmy.wtf 7 points 10 months ago

Nah, they know that an independent Palestine wouldn't play ball. The Israeli government would after stealing the territory, though.

[–] VikingHippie@lemmy.wtf 1 points 10 months ago

It fits IMO lol

[–] VikingHippie@lemmy.wtf 8 points 10 months ago

Who ever claimed that?

A SHITLOAD of people.

It's essentially been the man's entire career

True. I didn't say they were right, just that they were saying it.

If he wasn't publicly speaking up early enough in this case, I'm sure it's because he was bending ears behind the scenes.

No doubt about it.

Not arguing with you, just sort of aghast that anyone (magas excepted - but we expect their opinions to be trash) would try to claim he's not a true servant of the people.

Agreed, though I'd add Neoliberals and people who don't have any ideals of their own but still like discussing politics for the tribalism and the mud slinging. Of course, there's significant overlap between these groups..

view more: ‹ prev next ›