VolunTerry

joined 1 year ago
[–] VolunTerry@monero.town 1 points 11 months ago

Smart advice. Also use Monero online or off where you can.

[–] VolunTerry@monero.town 3 points 11 months ago

Precisely. Avoiding the pitfalls of modern tech and actively pursuing privacy strangely and conversely makes you stand out more, not less.

[–] VolunTerry@monero.town 16 points 11 months ago

Anyone got a line on a good cabin? Tell the realtor not to call or text me though. I'll only be responding via telegram (not THAT Telegram, dummy) delivered by horse and rider.

[–] VolunTerry@monero.town 4 points 1 year ago

I believe that Odysee and LBRY (the blockchain-based back end technology Odysee sprung from and draws on) are separate companies with different people running them.

You don't have to touch crypto or use any crypto features to use Odysee, so I'd still suggest it as a platform in the toolbelt in addition to a lot of the other great recommendations you've already gotten here in other replies.

[–] VolunTerry@monero.town 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

VeraCrypt and 7zip are both good recommendations. I've read up on cryptomator, but haven't used it yet, so it's good to read an endorsement of it from someone who does for cloud storage.

Edit: you could also encrypt it with a local pgp key if you already use that encryption method with a pgp program or provider

[–] VolunTerry@monero.town 1 points 1 year ago

A lot of services actively disable VoIP numbers from being used for registration or submission.

[–] VolunTerry@monero.town 1 points 1 year ago

Yep. I've tried using dummy numbers in the past for things where no phone contact is required for contact and it frequently triggers fraud prevention even if not rendered useless by sms verification before submission.

[–] VolunTerry@monero.town 1 points 1 year ago

I'd personally prefer they didn't implement any KYC-style identity verification at all in the first place, but it's not my service or project and I'm not a paying customer, so my preference is largely irrelevant to them. But that said, I didn't intend the comment to be damning, or even a particularly harsh criticism, just thought it wad an odd choice.

If what you are saying is accurate, and there aren't better options, I at least understand that choice a bit more. If they feel they need an identity provider for whatever reason, they should obviously choose the one they feel best fits that need. And as others have noted, different servers and instances can be spun up or utilized. Users can choose to utlize whichever fits their needs best, or none if none of them fit.

Your other point is well taken though that it may be a gap in the marketplace. Sounds to me like a need waiting to be filled. I recall reading about some decentralized blockchain solutions for this sometime back, but do not recall the specifics. I haven't followed along because it didn't seem relevant to my personal or business needs at the time.

If anyone else knows of alternative options that may be better or more privacy friendly, I'd certainly be interested to hear about them. And would chip in funding for any good FOSS projects that might seek to solve this problem.

[–] VolunTerry@monero.town 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

I agree with you and it's an important distinction. But for me it's also about the ethos of the developers or company. Promoting free and open source tools is great, but requiring the opposite as a prerequisite to use the largest publicly facing implementation of that is a very odd decision.

[–] VolunTerry@monero.town 9 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Absolutely rubbish company that has nearly cornered the market on venues artists and events and made the entire process of engaging with live entertainment worse and worse as time goes on.

The awful practices of Ticketmaster/Livenation are many, including many things others have already listed as well as an increasing phase-out out of cash and other anonymous payment methods throughout the entire process, including at the actual participating venues themselves.

[–] VolunTerry@monero.town 2 points 1 year ago

Smart. Everyone reading this thread who cares about privacy and separation of work and personal life should follow your lead.

[–] VolunTerry@monero.town 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Unfortunately, words on paper frequently fail to prevent organizations, public of private, from doing things they are technically not allowed to do. See the security state apparatus of any of the nations around the world including the 5, 9 and 14 eyes, or any number of tech companies that claim and market privacy respective policies only for people to uncover later that what they pitch publicly diverges in spirit from what they do or what is in the actual terms of service.

Hopefully if people find their employer going outside the bounds of the contract they can catch it, catalog it and hold them to account. Accountability can often be tricky and costly though.

view more: ‹ prev next ›