Why would (aside from stupidity) would that sheriff recently make the statement about noting who has democrat signs in their yards if they could just find out everyone who voted democrat?
It was mostly for intimidation. And I don't think that Sheriff in particular has easy access to these records. Sounds like you need to form a PAC, find the data brokers, and then buy it off them.
Much cheaper to just intimidate the local population with thug tactics.
I doubt she cares. If she's ever challenged, all she has to do is say "but Trump would be worse" and millions would fall in line.
And I sincerely doubt Lina Khan is a line in the sand for pretty much any Democratic Party voter. They'll hold their nose and vote for Harris as long as her positions are marginally better than Trumps.
filibuster has no purpose but to block progressive legislation.
First time?
It's not going to happen. Especially if the rumours of Harris replacing Lina Khan are true.
Don't get your hopes up. The US political class is far more pro business than people here would like.
Neo libs are always anti genocide as long as the genocide has already happened and their actions can't change the outcome.
It's polling of the audience done only on the first night, so the majority of the people being polled were interested enough in the movie in the first place to go see it opening night without proper reviews. Most movies will have an inflated Cinemascore.
I'd argue edgy atheists are even worse. They'll kill you and your entire family and then eat your pets and shit on your lawn just for believing in God.
If you disagree, you just don't get it sucker.