While the christofascists and white supremacists and misogynists and the rest of the reactionary pieces of shit that make up so much of Trump's base get most of the press, they aren't the real threat. The real threat is the people who are bankrolling him - the wealthy few who don't have a stake in any of that bullshit and just want to take advantage of whatever opportunity they can get to transform the US into an autocracy in which their rule, and our subjugation, will be absolute.
WatDabney
joined 11 months ago
No - it's 27 times bigger.
A yard is 3 times bigger than a foot so a cubic yard is 3^3^ (3 cubed) times bigger.
Pops gets confused sometimes...
Huh...
It's almost as if forests have evolved to be part of a complex system...
Almost as if there was an entire era in the history of the Earth that was dominated by plant growth and evolution, potentially even directly in response to the existence of an atmosphere notably rich in carbon compounds...
All the way through this ordeal of Biden possibly, then actually, stepping down, I've been sort of lukewarm about the idea of Harris replacing him for one and only one reason - because I assumed that, since she's the VP and the obvious first choice for a replacement, the Trump campaign would already have a complete hate campaign against her primed and ready to go, so could potentially catch her and the Dems flat-footed.
It's astonishing how wrong I was.
Nothing I disagree with there. Unfortunately.
And along those same lines, it calls to mind a thing that's concerned me to some degree all along, and just that much more so since Biden dropped out.
The painfully obvious DNC/democrat establishment strategy for decades at least has been to try to maintain the flow of corporate soft money by running candidates who aren't going to upset the status quo, which is to say are not actually leftists, and to count on just being arguably somewhat less bad than the Republican to be enough to win, or at least not lose embarrassingly badly.
And as far as that goes, Trump provides them with a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity, since it would be nearly impossible for the DNC/dem establishment to put up a candidate who's worse, and more to the point, the threat that Trump and his plutocratic backers and christofascist coattail-riders pose is so blatant snd severe that an awful lot of overt malfeasance on the part of the dem candidate - much more than has already been the case - would be overlooked.
I see it in myself. Even as aware as I am and as much as I loathe the establishment scum and their cynical and entirely self-serving manipulation, Trump and his handlers and followers are such an existential threat that I see no reasonable choice other than to vote for whoever ends up running against him.
But I hate it, and the more I think about it, the more I hate it, and it makes me concerned not just for who that might be (it could be much worse than Harris) but of what they might do after the election, presuming they win. We could even potentially end up trading the threat of one autocracy for the reality of another, just arguably somewhat less bad, one.
Cynically, I take this to mean that he's given up on the possibility of a 2024 presidential run.
While this will undoubtedly be popular with Californians who don't give a shit about homeless people and just don't want to have to see it, it would almost certainly have led to some blowback in the middle of a Democratic presidential campaign, so it's safe to assume that the decision was waiting in the wings so to speak - ready to be implemented, but only when it wouldn't cause problems for his federal aspirations.
I was hoping for that.
He's a lame duck now. That means he's free to pursue policies that will add to his legacy, and without having to give even the tiniest shit about what the establishment and the donor class might think about it.
Right, but at this point, I wouldn't put it past a court to just dream up some other excuse for ruling as their bias/bribes dictate.
Well... I guess this, as all cases involving Trump now seem to, is going to hinge on whether this is a court that still follows the rule of law, or one of the seemingly growing number that follow the rule of demagoguery, shallow self-interest and corruption.
This is what I was waiting for.
Faced with a black/asian woman, the Republicans just aren't going to be able to help themselves - their hateful bigotry is going to keep rearing its ugly head.
The key moment is going to be when Candidate Lardbucket himself lets some of his own racism and misogyny fall out of his festering gob. That's going to be glorious.
On brand.
It's oddly appropriate that those who are most focused on the supposed inherent moral imperative to have children are so often such awful parents.