WitchHazel

joined 1 year ago
[–] WitchHazel@lemmygrad.ml 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Do you mind elaborating on why you're done with arch?

[–] WitchHazel@lemmygrad.ml 3 points 8 months ago (5 children)

?

Scratch a liberal I guess

[–] WitchHazel@lemmygrad.ml -4 points 8 months ago (8 children)

Tbh with how yall are denying the gender pay gap and acting like you carry the world I'm kinda rethinking my support of men in any way. Like bro women get drafted too, and they're called trans women. The issues you're talking about don't even only affect men, so it really just ends up being ineffectual whining.

When I presented male and worked at McDs, I had the highest wages of anybody but the manager. After I transitioned, they wouldn't hire me. That's an infinitely large pay gap.

[–] WitchHazel@lemmygrad.ml 0 points 8 months ago

So you're able to recognize that women CAN do dangerous work that pays well, but unable to recognize that sex work being the most done dangerous job for women isn't a problem? Do you not realize that most sex workers make far less money than similarly dangerous jobs? You might see top dollar escorts on the internet but the vast majority are women who are one paycheck away from homelessness. You're also not considering the availability of these jobs to women. I work in tech, and I no longer get job offers after transitioning. That isn't a mistake. Women do not fit cultures constant sexual harassment and racism, which is what men expect from them. Women are seen as less capable and less intelligent. Inb4 you argue I should have to do something dangerous and unrelated to the education I payed for.

Also, your gender bioessentialism is extraordinarily outdated, and reeks of alpha male podcasts. You're probably the type of guy to feel emasculated when a woman is stronger than you.

[–] WitchHazel@lemmygrad.ml 5 points 8 months ago (1 children)

So instead of changing the laws you would rather...just let it happen? Alternatively, you don't have to obey the law. Enamel paint is very cheap and easy to apply to lenses. I think breaking the machines would curb their use, no?

[–] WitchHazel@lemmygrad.ml 4 points 8 months ago

As an interviewer, you do not have the elevated role necessary to determine if your method of interview results in better candidates, especially since you didn't try any alternatives beyond an automated code submission. This is intellectual dishonesty that serves to shelter the author from thinking critically about the affects their actions actually have.

[–] WitchHazel@lemmygrad.ml 3 points 8 months ago

I struggle to find very obvious things when using ddg, unfortunately
Feels bad

[–] WitchHazel@lemmygrad.ml 1 points 8 months ago (1 children)
[–] WitchHazel@lemmygrad.ml 1 points 8 months ago

Okay, but in that situation we don't say that the market has punished that business. They should be hurt worse than they could any other way, so there isn't a possibility that they profit in net, or have a loss equivalent with legitimate business practices. Otherwise, there is no real deterrent to the behavior.

[–] WitchHazel@lemmygrad.ml 2 points 8 months ago

Unfortunately a guy I know works for a gov hospital and they've used such technology for over a decade at this point. It seems unavoidable.

[–] WitchHazel@lemmygrad.ml 2 points 9 months ago

The people in charge of these decisions should zip-tie a garbage bag over their heads and go swimming. This is violence that they've committed.

[–] WitchHazel@lemmygrad.ml 3 points 10 months ago

If the only thing you need to do is test out the different DEs, you should be able to just install each one and use something like lightdm to easily switch between them upon logging out.

view more: next ›