Womble

joined 3 weeks ago
[–] Womble@piefed.world 3 points 53 minutes ago

Yeah, I too hate those hypcrites who complain about the massive environmental impact of AI, then drive a 10 mile round trip to buy a burger made from a cow raised on soy.

[–] Womble@piefed.world 14 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago)

Just FYI, this use of republic is not recognised in political science and as far as I've seen is only used by americans justifying why their system is undemocratic. Republic just comes from "res Publica" (public affair) and means the head of state is not a monarch but a member of the public. There are very democratic republics like Finland and there are very undemocratic republics like the PRC. The way you describe a republic would apply to countries like the UK or Sweden, which are constitutional monarchies, not republics.

Representative democracy is a better term for what you are talking about, where the population elects representatives who are able to advocate for them and take the time to become subject matter experts on running the country (idealy).

[–] Womble@piefed.world 2 points 1 day ago

I dont think AI has much to do with them dropping the greenwashing, it's kissing the ring to Trump. If Harris had won they would still be going just as hard on AI but trying harder to keep the green messaging going.

[–] Womble@piefed.world 14 points 2 days ago

If the tax is on fuel then it wouldnt matter where they are registered, they'd be getting refueled in the EU and so would pay the tax.

wouldn't this result in airlines dumping the extra cost on customers

yes, partially. If the increase in tax results in a particular flight being £50 more expensive for example they will rise prices by an amount. But it likely wont be the full 50 as airlines are already charging what they think the optimum price is, the price going up is likely to result in less sales.

It also incentivises the airlines to be more fuel efficient (and so less damaging to the climate), and punishes worse offenders like private jets more as the use more fuel per passenger mile.

[–] Womble@piefed.world 38 points 3 days ago (1 children)

The most annoying thing is there is a trivial to implement way to close to halve these stupidly inflated sizes: make the highest resolution of textures a free DLC that you optionally install

[–] Womble@piefed.world 4 points 4 days ago

Yes, i find it difficult to believe that they mess up a dozen line algo that is in their training set in a prominant place with no complicating factors. Despite what a lot of people here think, LLMs do have value for coding. Even if the companies selling them make ridiculous claims about what they can do.

[–] Womble@piefed.world 3 points 4 days ago

Presumably the devs have to agree to it. I dont think gog cn just decide "were going to give away this game we dont own for free"

[–] Womble@piefed.world 2 points 4 days ago

I mean, they already are, just for recruitment to the army rather than factories. There's plenty of stories of people being rounded up by police, put on trumped up charges and being given the option of jail and abuse there or signing up to go to the front line.

[–] Womble@piefed.world 7 points 4 days ago

Thats pretty funny given the current "save the children" censorship in the uk that is going on.

[–] Womble@piefed.world 12 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (7 children)

I find that very difficult to believe. If for no other reason that there is an implementation in the wiki page for Levenshtein distance (and wiki is known to be very prominant in the training sets used for foundational models), and that trying it just now and it gave a perfectly functional implementation.

[–] Womble@piefed.world 3 points 4 days ago

Yep, and when you click a button that liteally says "make this discoverable on search engines" which is off by defualt, its the later.

view more: next ›