Wooster

joined 1 year ago
[–] Wooster@startrek.website 106 points 8 months ago (10 children)

Is this a Russian style self inflicted wound…?

[–] Wooster@startrek.website 15 points 8 months ago (1 children)

I wish the actors were cleared to reveal little things… otherwise these interviews are just barely interactive NDAs.

[–] Wooster@startrek.website 12 points 8 months ago

I wasn’t expecting an Animorphs reference . Gosh does that take me back.

[–] Wooster@startrek.website 16 points 8 months ago (7 children)

Cool.

Do Facebook next.

They are doing Facebook next, right?

Right?

[–] Wooster@startrek.website 72 points 8 months ago (2 children)

I swear, Texas’s grid is the sort of thing that would’ve been written out of a dystopian novel for being too cartoonishly evil.

[–] Wooster@startrek.website 2 points 8 months ago

Huh… I wonder if the Borg Corgi is a homage to the “Ensign Sue Must Die” saga, which featured a Borg Beagle.

[–] Wooster@startrek.website 20 points 8 months ago (4 children)

I question how much of this is a logistics issue, vs how much of this is because half the population is convinced that basic medical care causes Down syndrome .

[–] Wooster@startrek.website 6 points 8 months ago

Mm… again not a lawyer, but I think that question goes beyond the scope of the document.

It basically gives the government permission to hold renters accountable for using software to artificially raise prices. What form that accountability takes is not addressed. Either that’s covered under existing collusion laws or is up to the courts.

So, it’s an essential ingredient to the cake that you’re describing… but unless prosecution (or whatever the term actually is) brings that up (I assume?), it won’t happen.

[–] Wooster@startrek.website 15 points 8 months ago

The joint legal brief clarifies that it is indeed collusion. And continues to explain how this is a technological evolution of the handshake.

[–] Wooster@startrek.website 48 points 8 months ago (5 children)

I just read the joint legal brief, and, I have to say up front that I am not remotely a lawyer… but the document specifies how and where to identify price fixing, and that motions to dismiss those charges are to be dismissed.

So it doesn't dictate the penalties for price fixing (I assume that's on a trial by trial basis—but again, not a lawyer), but it makes it impossible(?) to ignore, and suggests that (to me), users of 'RENTMaximizer' will be in the crosshairs… while not actually stating that.

[–] Wooster@startrek.website 7 points 8 months ago (1 children)

An exceptional shortfall in hydropower due to extreme droughts in the US, China, and several other economies resulted in over 40% of the rise in emissions in 2023 as countries turned largely to fossil fuels to plug the gap.

I’m honestly surprised Hydro (or rather lack thereof) accounted for that much of the difference.

[–] Wooster@startrek.website 4 points 8 months ago

The range of both vehicles is comparable, so I’d argue it boils down to which dealer is more convenient to visit for the odd maintenance.

(That aside, I’m personally dubious of opting for a lease, especially if money is tight long term. But I’m the sort of person who’d opt to get every damned mile out of a vehicle I could before begrudgingly admitting it’s time for a replacement.)

view more: ‹ prev next ›