Xcf456

joined 1 year ago
[–] Xcf456@lemmy.nz 2 points 4 months ago

Yeah like I said, "better things aren't possible" fatalism.

[–] Xcf456@lemmy.nz 2 points 4 months ago (4 children)

I didn't say I don't consider roads as critical infrastucture, I specifically said "mega roads", i.e new multi lane motorways that are a waste of money because they will encourage more driving, more sprawl and make traffic even worse in the long run (and I imagine local roads will deteriorate as they did the last time this happened).

Three waters, the ferries, state housing, public transport are all better options right now that are woefully underfunded and in fact actively sabotaged by this govt.

The "we don't have the density" argument is often pulled out against funding public transport and it's unfounded. We're one of the most urbanised countries in the world. We could absolutely build more PT if we chose to, we've had far more extensive networks in the past than what we currently do.

Overall, saying what's happening is a symptom is just an attempt to claim what's happening right now is inevitable imo. Different choices can be made that would be far less damaging, they'd be positive even and actually address the underlying problems you highlight instead of this "better things aren't possible" fatalism.

[–] Xcf456@lemmy.nz 4 points 4 months ago (7 children)

Terribly, with a layer of sneering smugness to boot. The austerity justifciations are national party spin, swallowed whole. The govt is throwing billions to landlords and mega roads while cutting funding for public housing, critical infrastructure and even fucking food banks at a time of record demand for them.

They're also dumping costs onto households by cranking up user charges and abandoning councils to pay for decades of infrastructure underinvestment.

So no, they've chosen to loot and plunder.

[–] Xcf456@lemmy.nz 7 points 8 months ago

Why should any of that matter for making transport better in cities where none of this applies

[–] Xcf456@lemmy.nz 4 points 8 months ago

Yes but that's a different argument again. The post said cities and the response was about rural areas

[–] Xcf456@lemmy.nz 22 points 8 months ago (18 children)

This post is talking exclusively about cities, I'm not sure why this argument about rural areas comes up so often when it's not relevant.

[–] Xcf456@lemmy.nz 14 points 9 months ago (2 children)

Pretty crazy to think they got broken up in the late 90s/early 2000s for simply including IE in a fresh Windows install (im probably over simplifying but still). Yet these days they're pulling this kind of shit

[–] Xcf456@lemmy.nz 13 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)
[–] Xcf456@lemmy.nz 8 points 9 months ago

it could also just be a group of rocks in the shape of a plane

This whole search was as useless as those plane shaped rocks. Wait a minute.. There's a plane behind those rocks!

[–] Xcf456@lemmy.nz 43 points 9 months ago (7 children)

The reddit api blocking 3rd party apps pushed a whole bunch of people onto lemmy, and lemmy is very big on FOSS and Linux so it's been a gateway of sorts

[–] Xcf456@lemmy.nz 6 points 11 months ago

It's not clear from the way the article quotes him exactly what he said should be "ripped out completely". You seem to be interpreting it as "all city roads should be ripped out completely".

I suspect he's saying we could rip out many city roads, completely turning them into green spaces and with forms of more active transport. I don't think this is saying remove all roads to the extent goods vehicles can't enter.

[–] Xcf456@lemmy.nz 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Still a net reduction though, a lot of those crops go to feed cows, pigs and chickens so if you remove that step and just eat the crops far fewer animals get killed

view more: next ›