aSingularFemboyHooter

joined 1 year ago
 

Checks date

Yeah, I want to make use of an IDE floppy drive, which will need to use a SATA adaptor to hook up to the server. I'll probably be using a Debian-based container, and I'll need to automatically read the contents of the disk in some way.

I'm kinda assuming this is actually viable, and that I can work along the basic process of using an off-the-shelf IDE-SATA adapter, give it a mount point in the system, then monitor that directory.

I'm still fairly new to Linux, so I'm not aware of all the quirks and astrices that often come up, especially when wanting to do something like this in 2023.

For the curious, I'm building a centralised music system that will serve multiple speakers, including RF. I'll be managing the music and play lists via whichever modern music server seems the most appropriate, but I thought it would be really neat to use floppy disks as a physical way of selecting playlist, but not exclusively.

All the disks would contain are small ID tokens that represent the playlist on the digital system. The software will monitor the drive, and when a new token is identified, it will simply trigger the playlist to start, presumably via an API call.

Completely pointless, but I like tactile shit and the nostalgia factor!

[–] aSingularFemboyHooter@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Coming at this from a very basic level, but I'm wondering if this could help me.

I have such an unnecessarily hard time with Bluetooth. I have all kinds of devices (usually speakers, headphones and such) which I don't use, because switching them between input devices can be like pulling teeth.

For example:

  • at my desk with my wired headphones watching something in tbe background I'm enjoying
  • need to do something at my workbench, which has a chromecast on a monitor
  • I can cast the video there, but I don't want to use the big speakers because it's late
  • my small wireless speaker is paired to my phone, I can't remember how to re-pair, don't want to go through Chromecast settings
  • same with my earbuds
  • end up 'watching' on my phone because it's too much effort to use the actual TV!

I've been thinking about making a physical central BT 'broadcaster' which I pair everything to. It would be able to take multiple aux or bluetooth inputs, and would have a switch or mixer to control the inputs.

Would something like this help with any of those issues without having to build something like that (which also wouldn't be optimal)?

Im on mobile, and some of those features have gone way over my head!

I think that's what they're saying, in that, use proxmox to host a gaming vm. But choosing a hypervisor that can run games well bare-metal does sidestep some potential headaches.

[–] aSingularFemboyHooter@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I love Linux, but I do generally consider it a special-purpose OS. Servers, embedded stuff, etc, I will always go with some flavour of Linux.

But for a daily driver I do struggle imagining using anything other than Windows. Like sure, I could probably get all my games and CAD software working in a Linux OS. But I can easily grab Win10 LTSB and have everything just work. I have to make a living from my machine, and ultimately I just need it to work.

If I was doing just web and office work, then it would be no harder really, but I've finally accepted that not everything should be a project!

Sometimes that's a tactic, sometimes it's wild optimism, and sometimes they seem content to make a loss every year and prop it up with investment.

I don't know about stealing, they stopped taking money when I unsubbed, now I'm watching shit that somebody else paid to make, while not giving them a penny back!

[–] aSingularFemboyHooter@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

But then how else can I overcomplicate things? You're right, thanks, and also thanks for the heads up on Proxmox. I picked up an old Checkpoint 4800 for less than the 400g solid copper heatsink is worth which I will run Proxmox on, which will give me a chance to get to know it!

[–] aSingularFemboyHooter@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The server is amazing, way quieter than I expected, I had a whole soundproofed rack planned, but the fans just chill at 20%! I think it'll be almost silent once I have the rack built.

Lots of people get on okay with it, and I'm not the most experienced, but docker problems with Scale seem to be common, and the direction TrueNAS is going with Scale isn't going to make it any better.

I think Core is a bit better. But I'm definitely going to move away from it for Docker. Unraid was so easy for Docker, and I see it has ZFS support now, I'll let you know how I get on.

Also, don't forget the 720 has an internal USB port, because I did!

 

I'm a noob who thought they knew what they were doing!

My trusty unraid server running off some ancient consumer hardware finally gave up the ghost due to hardware failure. Needing an alternative in a hurry, I thought I'd do things properly, and got an incredible deal on an R720XD with shitloads of RAM and storage, couldn't be happier with the hardware.

It came with TrueNAS Scale already installed as it's what the previous owner was running. Got everything NAS set up in a couple of hours and have been running an SMB share quite happily.

However, I also run a fair few Docker containers, and this is where the pain starts. I've spent so long trying to get things working, and have simply hit a brick wall. Everything I try yields another bizarre error message that requires hours to resolve, and I feel like I'm trying to track down the solution for some obscure edge case rather than doing something incredibly standard. But I'm trying to piece things together from multiple guides and videos, none of which contain the whole story, and most of them result in more errors that aren't covered.

The TrueNAS forums look like a bit of a dumpster fire when it comes to these issues, particularly around containers, with things getting quite heated. The 'official apps' are extremely limited, TrueCharts extends functionality, but still limited, and not really working well for me. There seems to be a lot of friction with the devs of TrueCharts, and between people wanting to virtualise stuff and those who's solution to these issues is running TrueNAS bare metal and not using virtualisation or containers. It's like, yeah, you're less likely to have issues if you ignore half the feature set. And if it's only 'supposed' to be a file server, then it's frustrating that running it in a VM is also 'not officially supported' too.

I tried spinning up a Debian VM and managed to get Portainer running, but once again hit an absolute mess with filesystems and permissions for any other containers I tried running. I know it's to do with the quirks of TrueNAS and that the setup makes sense, especially for an enterprise focus, but this stuff just worked in Unraid as smooth as butter. I know it can be easier, and I'm just not having a good time. I want to be using containers, VMs and developing, not spending my 4th evening this week losing my mind over permissions so I can progress to the next error message!

Anyway

I am a noob, I liked Unraid, it worked, and TrueNAS Scale was probably never the right choice for me. But now I need to get redeployed quickly, and I'm looking for a path forward that gives me flexibility.

As I said, I like UnRaid, I'd quite like to give TrueNAS Core a try purely as a NAS, but I'm happy to stick with Unraid if that's going to save some headache. I'd quite like to try both to be honest, set up a hypervisor so I can get Unraid functional quickly, then slowly work on TrueNAS.

So I'm thinking XCP-ng or Proxmox bare-metal, Unraid for NAS + Docker, TrueNAS to work on, and the ability to spin up more VMs.

Problem there is that Unraid is only 'supposed' to be booted off a USB. Once again, any discussion of any other way is 'not supported' and discussions on the forums inevitably lead to 'why would you want to?' or 'you don't understand', implying you're trying to get better speed or something. I know it runs in RAM, I just don't really like having my config and license dangling off my server permanently (although I could try the internal USB), and virtualising it would be incredibly useful.

I could use Unraid as a hypervisor, I've heard of people adding a Proxmox VM to Unraid, which seems a bit bass ackwards on the surface, and doesn't 'feel' right, but I guess if it works it's fine. Unraid was absolutely rock solid stable for me, after all!

Again, I don't think I've particularly been fair here, in fact, TrueNAS has impressed me in lots of ways, and I shouldn't be critical of those doing development and answering the same questions over and over from people like me. I just need to get running, don't have a huge amount of free time at the moment, and just want to get NAS+Docker functioning, but ideally in VMs to reduce the upheaval when/if I change things again!

Your help would be appreciated, as would the extra sleep!

 

I currently have a workstation I use for productivity and gaming, as well as a 'server' running on an old Athlon CPU primarily functioning as a file server running Unraid, with several Docker containers.

For much beyond NAS functionality, this server is very underpowered, it's running an array of old HDDs, and where I'm messing around more with different environments, I could really use the ability to quickly spin up and switch between OS's.

Upgrading the server seems kinda silly when my workstation already has enough power and is always up. I'm thinking about running the workstation as the server using Unraid, setting it up with a HBA and some SAS drives I already have, then running several VMs.

I'd be daily driving these VMs, planning on Windows still for now, with things like CAD and gaming remaining the primary functions. I'd like to experiment with Linux more for regular use, and will likely be running additional VMs for development and experiments.

This sounds like a logical idea, but I'm concerned about some of the potential technicalities that could cause me problems. I know anticheat can be a concern, but I don't think that will effect any games I play.

Are there any additional things I should consider here? Am I best interfacing via thin client, or can I connect directly?

[–] aSingularFemboyHooter@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

This is life-changing. I can't believe this has been such an easy option!

Like OP, I couldn't really put my finger on why I found so much of this stuff frustrating, I think this will make a big difference for me.