aaaantoine

joined 1 year ago
[–] aaaantoine@lemmy.world 5 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

If one were to press charges against an IVF clinic I can imagine few greater uses of jury nullification.

[–] aaaantoine@lemmy.world 5 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Although not true, I give this a pass for being a Nirvana lyric.

[–] aaaantoine@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

OFF THE TOP ROPE!

[–] aaaantoine@lemmy.world 20 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Is that all it does? Is HP so backwards that they introduce a whole new attack surface just to store a date stamp?

...Actually don't answer that.

[–] aaaantoine@lemmy.world 3 points 9 months ago (3 children)

There's no way this would have been admissable as evidence on its own.

[–] aaaantoine@lemmy.world 20 points 9 months ago (9 children)

On one hand, 360hz seems imperceptibly faster than 240hz for human eyes.

On the other hand, if you get enough frames in, you don't have to worry about simulating motion blur.

[–] aaaantoine@lemmy.world 31 points 9 months ago

They've been separate desktop environments from the start. From top to bottom they share nearly nothing. The compositors, window managers, toolkits and shells are all different.

They also are ideologically opposed. If they merged, which direction would they go? The more feature-rich KDE? Or the more streamlined Gnome? Such a merger would lead to infighting and stagnation.

This is before even talking about the actual code underlying both environments.

I think it's better for everyone if they stay as two separate projects.

[–] aaaantoine@lemmy.world 7 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Right. Is it 10 figures? 7 figures?

... 5 figures?

[–] aaaantoine@lemmy.world 18 points 10 months ago (3 children)

Isn't this how Donnie Darko started?

[–] aaaantoine@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago

Cisco might have something to say about that name.

[–] aaaantoine@lemmy.world 5 points 10 months ago (1 children)

It did at least draw me to the comments section to see the chatter, but no, I pretty much expected what you quoted.

I guess it's open enough to interpretation to be misleading. Do readers think she was worried the kid was going after them next? Do they think she was worried one more of the students would come after her?

view more: next ›