admin

How does pointing that out make me a fanboy? Interesting you chose to call names and denounce instead of being civil like @viking@infosec.pub. Why is that?

Yes. 25% of U.S. citizens linguistically means 25% of all U.S. citizens. They don't need to specify alive, because they had to be alive inorder to participate. It is not dishonest in this case because they (the original study) listed the date the survey was conducted and didn't not try to portray an old study as modern.

The only thing needed is to add 'surveyed' after the descriptor. Anything else is dishonest.

Here in the next few weeks. I want to ensure nothing breaks, but I really just haven't gotten around to it.

Photon has infinite scrolling :). lemmyusa.com runs it

25% of 800 U.S. citizens surveyed is not indicative of the entire country. Not only that, the original study release here (as far as I could find) doesn't state how or where the survey was conducted.

A survey done in California would be wildly different than one done in Mississippi. That article and this post are ethically dishonest, and the study proves absolutely nothing.

Good work! Thank you for providing comprehensive installation instructions as well.

Okay so jaywalking doesn't warrant death. Where do you draw the line?

Investors offer money, federation goes bye-bye and you end up with another twitter.

I've heard from numerous people here that Mastodon is the "worst" of microblogging platforms on the Fediverse. Mainly due to its lack of features.

Yes I specifically sought out the comments you didn't see, what's so hard to understand about that?

I responded with the list of comments you claimed you didn't see, you already saw the other comments, why would I include them?