andrewrgross

Maybe one day we can get there, but right now it might be better for a lot of folks if the default was "I'm not horny".

But I'm with you on the dream.

I've heard this called "soft climate denial", and unforntuately it's widespread.

People like Joe Biden and Nancy Pelosi say that they believe in climate change. But let's imagine that we're roommates and you told me that there's an out of control wildfire a few miles away and the governor has told us all to evacuate. One roommate says that they don't belive it and they're staying. And I say 'Shame on you for denying this! I firmly believe in the wildfire. It's urgent that we act now, which is why I've ordered travel maps on Amazon so we can begin plotting our evacuation route as soon as they arrive.'

Would you characterize this is accepting the crisis, or being in a state of soft denial?

I don't know if this is a hot take, but I think allowing straight and cis people to identify as such is appropriate, because the alternative assumes that we live in a state of default heteronormativity.

If anything, I want to live in a world where homophobes get mad that if they want to be assumed to be straight online they have to identify like anyone else. No one gets assumed to be straight any more. That's better imo.

What broad coalition?

There was no coalition. It was a campaign by and for white college educated professional women in the suburbs.

That's not a coalition, that's a book club.

I'm not sure what the point of this is.

I didn't know who this specific woman is, but it doesn't sound like any of this is a secret. For instance, it is public knowledge that Qatar has provided financial aid to Hamas, and serves as a go-between for Israel and the US. Netanyanu famously defended his practice of facilitating these cash transfers.

Also, this all seems sort of secondary when Israel -- the US's close ally -- is beginning an extermination campaign in northern Gaza. It's hard to really discuss any other issue in the midst of what has become a macabre genocide in full view of the international community.

This is the shoddiest "good-cop-bad-cop" routine I've ever seen.

I think his intense commitment to getting Trump elected makes more sense when you consider this article.

His enormous wealth is largely stored in the form of Tesla stock, and that stock has been valued based on the belief that it isn't a car company, it's a robotaxi service currently selling the hardware to finance the software development. The value -- and his wealth -- can persist indefinitely as long as investors continue to accept that premise, no matter how long delayed. But if something tangibly undermines that premise, Musk could conceivably lose the majority of his wealth overnight.

The National Highway Traffic Safety Agency is probably the greatest threat to his wealth. He doesn't worry about competitors or protestors or Twitter users or advertisers. They're all just petty nuisances. But the federal regulator over roads... that is his proverbial killer snail. And I think fully capturing the entire federal regulatory state is his strategy to permanently confine that snail.

More than anything else, I think that's what is motivating his radical embrace of fascism.

I feel like if you think about this for even a minute this seems like the worst possible idea ever.

I mean, sure it's an achievement. But so is smashing the moon into the Earth.

At least 13, likely less than 19. Where you land is contextual to neighborhood and costume. And any age if you're with someone under 10.

Honestly, that's the main thing I was thinking.

Damn, that's rad as fuck

I'm sure whatever it is it'll be very fun and funny. I'm looking forward to this.