astreus

joined 1 year ago
[–] astreus@lemmy.ml 3 points 6 months ago

Work laptops in particular suck, I find. My first one was lagging, freezing, and crashing within months. The second one is three times as expensive but the same brand and is still not happy.

I also use Windows at home and haven't had the same experience. I think it's really manufacturer dependent

[–] astreus@lemmy.ml 2 points 8 months ago

If I had the money to pay for music twice I would 😅

[–] astreus@lemmy.ml 14 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (2 children)

It's true, but at least half the artists I listen to I would never have found if it weren't for streaming. Something is, after all, better than nothing.

And compared to the competition, Tidal's payments are good:

~30% more than Apple Music (0.01c)

~300% more than Spotify (0.003 - 0.005c)

~500% more than Soundcloud (0.0025c)

~1000% more than Pandora (0.00133c)

[–] astreus@lemmy.ml 19 points 8 months ago (5 children)

Been using tidal ever since Spotify's Joe Rogan debacle. Main reason? They actually pay the artist. But the sound quality is a nice bonus as well! No regrets...other than people trying to share music with me by sending a spotify link!

[–] astreus@lemmy.ml 9 points 9 months ago (2 children)

Considering how much of the web is AI-generated now (with it predicted to rise to 90% by the end of 2026) we've managed to turn a tool for connecting people to a tool for chatbots to talk to one another.

[–] astreus@lemmy.ml 5 points 10 months ago

Aren't you comparing apples and oranges:

If the server is private, then you can't search it. If the group is private, then you can't search it.

If it is public you can on either platform but must participate on the platform. That's what made Reddit unique: lurking was real easy and didn't require an account.

[–] astreus@lemmy.ml 3 points 10 months ago
[–] astreus@lemmy.ml 15 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (3 children)

With all my knowledge intact? Hell yes! I'd keep all that bitcoin instead of spending tens of thousands of it (about £100) on Silk Road in uni.

[–] astreus@lemmy.ml 0 points 10 months ago (1 children)

So this is a "I'm right and everyone else is wrong" situation? The whole point of Capitalism is actually in the name: those with capital (i.e. capitalists) control those without capital (i.e. workers).

You've decided that Adam Smith (the founding father of capitalism), the London School of Economics, Princeton, Harvard, etc are wrong. I wish I had half your confidence.

Last reply because there's no discussing someone that just goes "nuhuh just is" despite asking for sources and clarification.

[–] astreus@lemmy.ml 0 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (3 children)

I think you're using a different definition of class to the standard. Once again, I want to point out you are disagreeing with pretty much EVERY major academic on this subject, including, but not limited to:

Princeton

LSE

Harvard

So I'm curious as to where you got this notion from? Even Adam Smith distinguished social strata.

[–] astreus@lemmy.ml 1 points 10 months ago

I also present to you: the BBC trying to redefine (note, not remove) class in 2013: https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/special/2013/newsspec_5093/index.stm

[–] astreus@lemmy.ml 1 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (5 children)

Can you explain how you've come to that conclusion? It flies in the face of pretty much every sociologist for the last 200 years. Even Adam Smith, distinguished people by gentleman, farmer, and merchant with clear class distinctions between each, even if the term hadn't entered into the mainstream use yet.

view more: ‹ prev next ›