aubeynarf

joined 11 months ago
[–] aubeynarf@lemmynsfw.com 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I didn’t call for it to be censored. You are 100% pushing for an agenda, and arguing in support of it in other posts. You’re dodging the point raised and engaging in hypocrisy by yourself shutting down a debate because you don’t agree with it.

mass pasting an irrelevant response to people replying to you certainly doesn’t make you look like a good-faith participant.

[–] aubeynarf@lemmynsfw.com 0 points 2 months ago (3 children)

You are ignoring the big message, which has nothing to do with who you’re affiliated with - that voting for fringe spoiler candidates can and does lead to an outcome opposite of the ideals the voter may hold.

Don’t dance around that - perhaps learn something from it; but at least address it head on.

[–] aubeynarf@lemmynsfw.com 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

We can discuss the article here, thanks, and the overwhelming consensus seems to be that Jill Stein and her supporters are working against their own goals due to the structure of the electoral system. People are commenting on the articles you post making arguments about their basis and merit, and to have a discussion among themselves and you, the poster bringing these ideas.

Now, you’ve retreated to a position of “I just copy articles around so don’t involve me”, which is disingenuous. You are an active participant in choosing and distributing this content.

[–] aubeynarf@lemmynsfw.com 0 points 2 months ago (5 children)

Uh huh, that’s exactly what I said isn’t it?

[–] aubeynarf@lemmynsfw.com 0 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

I have to wonder why I haven’t seen any post from you describing alternative voting methods or how to take action on getting them accepted.

Voting for a third-party candidate, who will lose and cannot affect policy, is not a way to do this - especially someone who has been as absolutely ineffectual and unsuccessful as Jill Stein.

also, imagine that you went to, let’s say a software engineering meet up, and talked to people about your idea for an implementation strategy, and people came out of the woodwork to tell you it was a bad idea and you would lose data. Would you listen to the advice and consider that you may not have had as broad perspective as you think or may have missed something in your reasoning, or would you double down over and over again?

[–] aubeynarf@lemmynsfw.com 0 points 2 months ago (7 children)

yes, that staunch socialist that posts “things they might find interesting” in /conservative

[–] aubeynarf@lemmynsfw.com 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

they can never win, they can only make other people lose. that’s a pretty shitty raison d’être.

[–] aubeynarf@lemmynsfw.com -3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Just curious, do you work with schizoidman?

[–] aubeynarf@lemmynsfw.com 0 points 2 months ago (3 children)

or they could jam the signal.

[–] aubeynarf@lemmynsfw.com 4 points 2 months ago (1 children)

No, we don’t. Why would you make a statement like that?

[–] aubeynarf@lemmynsfw.com 4 points 2 months ago (1 children)

What about relative energy (energy per mass) - if poop is less energy dense than the protein/fat of your tissues, excreting it should increase your energy density

view more: ‹ prev next ›