b1t

joined 5 days ago
[–] b1t@lemm.ee 3 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago)

Mad.

Edit: They've edited both of their previous posts to re-frame the argument after the fact and removed a personal attack. Classy.

[–] b1t@lemm.ee 2 points 7 hours ago (2 children)

See my previous post...

It’s better to be safe than sorry is all I’m saying.

Also 3 separate cases have been posted above. Just continue ignoring those, I guess.

[–] b1t@lemm.ee 2 points 8 hours ago

My brother and a buddy both have Alexas. And yeah, I hate being anywhere near the thing.

[–] b1t@lemm.ee 2 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago) (4 children)

If no proof is offered (in either direction), then the proposition can be called unproven, undecided, inconclusive, an open problem or a conjecture.

Stating that you don't think that it's possible is irrelevant. It's either happening or it isn't. True or false. P or ¬P.

is extremely unlikely to be true in my opinion.

Is an argument from ignorance. Not trying to be rude, but this is basic logic.

[–] b1t@lemm.ee 5 points 19 hours ago

Yeah, but it's rooted and running a custom ROM ;)

[–] b1t@lemm.ee 5 points 19 hours ago

This is why jailbreaking/rooting your phone is so important.

[–] b1t@lemm.ee 7 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago) (8 children)

Argument from ignorance

It's better to be safe than sorry is all I'm saying.

Edit: There's also this.

[–] b1t@lemm.ee 46 points 20 hours ago (23 children)

This has always blown my mind. Watching people willingly allow Big Brother-esque devices into their home for very, very minor conveniences like turning on some gimmicky multi-colored light bulbs. Now they're literally using home "security" cameras that store everything on some random cloud server. I'll truly never understand.

[–] b1t@lemm.ee 17 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The first rule of Usenet is: You don't speak of Usenet. They like being kept off the radar, but braggers can't help but bring it up every opportunity they get.

[–] b1t@lemm.ee 56 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

It's because the Moderates (aka. Republicans in blue suits) control the party and it's been this way for far too long.

It's the same reason Nancy Pelosi kept stepping on AOC's toes and even worked to keep her out of key committee positions, despite her being popular with a lot of Democratic voters.

[–] b1t@lemm.ee 38 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Exactly, removing birthright citizenship should only be possible through a constitutional convention. It's not up to SCOTUS what parts of the constitution we do and don't recognize.

[–] b1t@lemm.ee 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

You should check out the NEO Surveyor mission. Planned launch is in 2027 :)

view more: next ›