I miss 3 days ago when the blockade was just some HTML

Plasma, but only on Wayland (which is better anyway unbiased opinion).

Is it not ok to put the bounty there in writing and send the money without the help of another service?

I think we agree here, tho I seem to have formulated my comment in a way where it didn't seem like that.

Their TL;DR is at the bottom:

Summing up

Over time, commands have become more complex to turn off user account passwords, and the attack surface of Linux systems has also increased. The correct procedure is as follows:

1. Stop all Linux processes owned by the user:

# killall -STOP -u

2. Delete the user password:

# passwd -d

3. Lockdown the user account:

# usermod -L -e 1

4. Politely refuse a login for the user account:

# usermod -s /usr/sbin/nologin

Reversing all that is underneith the TL;DR:

How do I reverse the procedure?

First, set user login shell to /bin/bash:

# usermod -s /bin/bash

Unlock the user account:

# passwd -u

Set a new password for the user account:

# passwd

If the Linux system wasn’t rebooted and all processes weren’t killed unlock and resume all Linux processes owned by the user:

# killall -CONT -u

Yeah, he's just based like that

KDE/Linux

I thought it had to do with screen width

I'm not here to have the Fedora Telemetry discussion, but I think it's not spying If the user has choice and control over what gets through if anything

not all telemetry is bad or spying

They're better than

cd something
ls
cd something-else
ls
cd ../..
ls

Good there's a more official way now, I just added the entire part to the custom filter list previously.