bamboo

joined 1 year ago
[–] bamboo@lemm.ee 7 points 4 months ago

It’s a small price for freedom

[–] bamboo@lemm.ee 1 points 4 months ago

Instruction decoding takes space and power. If there are fewer, smaller transistors dedicated to the task it will take less space and power.

[–] bamboo@lemm.ee 1 points 4 months ago (2 children)

Well, not exactly. You have to remove instructions at some point. That’s what Intel’s x86-S is supposed to be. You lose some backwards compatibility but they’re chosen to have the least impact on most users.

[–] bamboo@lemm.ee 2 points 4 months ago

I also haven’t wanted an Intel processor in a while . They used to be best in class for laptops prior to the M1, but they’re basically last now behind Apple, AMD, Qualcomm. They might win in a few specific benchmarks that matter very little to people, and are still the default option in most gaming laptops. For desktop use the Ryzen family is much more compelling. For servers they still seem to have an advantage but it’s also an industry which requires longer term contracts that Intel has the infrastructure for more so than it’s competitors, but ARM is also gaining ground there with exceptional performance per watt.

[–] bamboo@lemm.ee 6 points 4 months ago

Exactly. Adding a third should be much simpler than a second.

[–] bamboo@lemm.ee 3 points 4 months ago

I know, it just would have been wrong to say no battery at all

[–] bamboo@lemm.ee 25 points 4 months ago (9 children)

As a fellow risc-v supporter, I think the rise of arm is going to help risc-v software support and eventually adoption. They’re not compatible, but right now developers everywhere are working to ensure their applications are portable and not tied to x86. I imagine too that when it comes to emulation, emulating arm is going to be a lot easier than x86, possibly even statically recompilable.

[–] bamboo@lemm.ee 1 points 4 months ago (2 children)

I’m both surprised and not surprised that ever since the M1, Intel seems to just be doing nothing in the consumer space. Certainly losing their contract with Apple was a blow to their sales, and with AMD doing pretty well these days, ARM slowly taking over the server space where backwards compatibility isn’t as significant, and now Qualcomm coming to eat the windows market, Intel just seems like a dying beast. Unless they do something magical, who will want an Intel processor in 5 years?

[–] bamboo@lemm.ee 1 points 4 months ago (4 children)

All else being equal, a complex decoding pipeline does reduce the efficiency of a processor. It’s likely not the most important aspect, but eventually there will be a point where it does become an issue once larger efficiency problems are addressed.

[–] bamboo@lemm.ee 3 points 4 months ago (1 children)

We stuck to x86 forever because backwards compatibility and because nobody had anything better. Now manufacturers do have something better, and it’s fast enough that emulation is good enough for backwards compatibility.

[–] bamboo@lemm.ee 7 points 4 months ago (2 children)

I mean fuck trump but he should be entitled to the same process as anybody else

[–] bamboo@lemm.ee 6 points 4 months ago (2 children)

With almost no battery even

view more: ‹ prev next ›