bcotrim

joined 11 months ago
[–] bcotrim@alien.top 1 points 10 months ago

There you have it, you listen to him on those topics because of that. His famous because of his football merits but his opinions on those topics matter because of what you pointed out

[–] bcotrim@alien.top 1 points 10 months ago

He could have always renegotiated his contract to a lower one and then he'd become an absolute legend, while being repaied over the years as a club embassador that does nothing

There were definitely alternatives, he chose to make a bank which wouldn't be a problem if he didn't use some social issues for PR earlier

[–] bcotrim@alien.top 1 points 10 months ago (2 children)

You can be knowledgeable in more than one field

You can, but you need to prove it by showing your know knowledge in said field. In that case, you listen to someone talking about hockey that happens to be a successful footballer, not because he's a successful footballer

I don't know Cech outside of football, but I'm assuming the reason you and others (in particular, hockey people and drummers) listen to him on those topics and found it to make sense. Yes, without him being a successful footballer you'd never heard about him, but he still needed to prove himself on that

Then you also have the obvious that having certain issues in some issues raises your commercial value to a degree that hockey and drumming don't

[–] bcotrim@alien.top 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Qatar 2022 was a success by their metrics, of course they'd do it again. Unless some FA or players boycott it, there's no incentive for them to not do it

[–] bcotrim@alien.top 1 points 11 months ago

That's why no politics should be displayed on the field. It was the same with the BLM, you could have that on shirts but not against China treatment of the Uyghur, for example

Politics can still be discussed by footballers and in the media around it, but during the game, football should be the only show, otherwise you're just using it to push your beliefs