blabber6285

joined 1 year ago
[–] blabber6285@sopuli.xyz 3 points 2 months ago

Well the "sources say" implicates that they actually don't know. They've just heard someone say it. So it's definitely necessary.

[–] blabber6285@sopuli.xyz 15 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

This was definitely a fuckup from Slack but as I've understood it, the "AI training" means that they're able to suggest emoji reactions to messages.

Not sure how to think about this, but here's some additional info from slack: https://slack.engineering/how-we-built-slack-ai-to-be-secure-and-private/

Edit: Just to pick main point from the article:

Slack AI principles to guide us.

  • Customer data never leaves Slack.
  • We do not train large language models (LLMs) on customer data.
  • Slack AI only operates on the data that the user can already see.
  • Slack AI upholds all of Slack’s enterprise-grade security and compliance requirements.
[–] blabber6285@sopuli.xyz 11 points 1 year ago

I'm wondering what was the email usage like in the first place if you can just choose to stop sending to most people.

But to be honest, I've only sent handful of emails from my personal account within the same number of years.

[–] blabber6285@sopuli.xyz 19 points 1 year ago

Yeah, an incorrect cleaning procedure can cause a error that requires maintenance personnel to reset the error. They don't need to do anything else though, it's completely fine to just do the cleaning again. Stuff like that.

[–] blabber6285@sopuli.xyz 4 points 1 year ago

It's probably not an arbitrary explicit limitation just for the sake of it, they're likely using a cheaper component for the port.

[–] blabber6285@sopuli.xyz 3 points 1 year ago (10 children)

But it does whether you think it should. That's the very reason why all political messaging is forbidden close to voting stations.

[–] blabber6285@sopuli.xyz 8 points 1 year ago (10 children)

He did say "HOPEFULLY just innocent mistakes..." Which we all should hope whether we think all allegations are true or not.

[–] blabber6285@sopuli.xyz 9 points 1 year ago

There's different kind of "memories" when talking about metals but this is probably not related to that. What I suspect happened is cold fusion in a very clean environment without oxygen (or very low oxygen) where oxidation doesn't happen, allowing the very very small fractures to reattach.

[–] blabber6285@sopuli.xyz 7 points 1 year ago

Yeah and preventing that from happening in space is rather complex task. Especially on parts that grind against each other causing the existing oxidized layer to wear off.