bungalowtill

joined 7 months ago

more expensive? Jesus

Today they were kinda proved right, though. After having imposed another deadline on Israel and that deadline having again expired they again won’t stop sending arms to Israel. Even when this is the last fucking chance before Trump is taking over. You can’t just ignore this shit.

Where is oversimplification going to lead us one day?

Oh, it’s 2024, never mind then

[–] bungalowtill@lemmy.dbzer0.com 19 points 1 week ago (10 children)

How does this form of protest translate into a change of the tipping system?

Really, you think it’s ok to call anyone subhuman bitches?

are you having a nice time?

[–] bungalowtill@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

hm, so much…yet so little

But I hope you do know the content of your little collection here and know what a shaky case you have and what conclusions one could draw from that.

[–] bungalowtill@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 1 week ago (3 children)

show me your proof that the oil industry paid for anti nuclear sentiment. And try to avoid right wing propaganda. then you may claim whatever you want.

[–] bungalowtill@lemmy.dbzer0.com -2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (5 children)

I’m talking about the Energy Companies

Edit: the claim that the oil industry paid anyone to stop nuclear is a right wing lie. Please look it up, I don’t have the nerve for it anymore.

[–] bungalowtill@lemmy.dbzer0.com -3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (7 children)

Jesus man, you want to end capitalism but fall for one of its biggest outfits? Also, right now there is just the capitalist reality and within that science tells us, that nuclear is economically not good enough to support the green transformation. I am fine with overthrowing capitalism, but till then we have to somehow manage with a reality that is inseparable from it.

[–] bungalowtill@lemmy.dbzer0.com -2 points 1 week ago (9 children)

Ah, you assume there’s (or will be) unlimited funds set aside to fight climate change?
If that is so, why not plaster deserts with solar panels and the oceans with wind turbines. Would go a bit quicker than the 10-20 years it takes to finalise one nuclear power plant. The nuclear hype has no scientific basis.

[–] bungalowtill@lemmy.dbzer0.com -5 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (11 children)

Yeah, no. Nuclear is a con. Don‘t believe and spread the energy industry‘s lies. They’re shitting on renewables, because they want consumers dependant on their crap which needs to be subsidised by the state because it’s not economically viable. Thank you.

view more: next ›