cageythree

I admit that I just assumed that this rule would be in a place where you have to be able to see it before posting.

Now after your comment I've looked for it and the rule has only been announced in a pinned post. I agree that this is too hard to find; not everyone reads through every post in a community in case there are any rules for posting hidden in them (espefially when that post doesn't even mention the words rules in its title). So I agree that this one's on the community, thank you for clearing that up.

Inclusive doesn't mean they let everybody in regardless

It does. I mean, if they not let everybody participate it's by definition an exclusive community. In this case exclusive to women. Which is fine, but it is not universally inclusive (as the word "inclusive" without any further definition implies).

I get what they probably want to say - they include every woman, regardless of age/nationality, if it's a MTF trans woman etc. But they could have expressed this better - i.e. "inclusive community for women" or something.

On the other hand, you're supposed to read the rules when you post in a community the first time so this confusion could've been avoided by both sides.

Yeah, I assume if they took down Wikipedia itself then hundreds of copies would pop up all over the place, probably hosted elsewhere, and one of them would become the primary replacement over time.
Media might be lost to some extent, but I doubt there's any way you can take the text/information/metadata off the internet at all, and that's the most important aspect.

Took me a while not to read that as

The time has come to punish Orbán (and) Germany's next(, some) government says

Wouldn't be surprised if the kid playing on the mat would be part of the print as well.