catastrophicblues

joined 3 years ago
[–] catastrophicblues@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Even with this change, I'm not sure their argument makes sense. What part of the CCPA's definition of "sale of data" precludes them from using it is beyond me. The definition is clear about ending with "...for monetary or other valuable consideration". So what consideration is Mozilla getting for transferring data to web servers?

I understand funding a large project like Firefox is hard. But they also have some of the most hardcore fans tech has seen. Kagi has shown that users are willing to pay (I myself use their $10/mo plan). So why can Mozilla not attempt this? A lot of us donate to Mozilla Foundation--where does that money go? How much goes to Firefox?

[–] catastrophicblues@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 year ago

The ToU is in Mozilla's Bedrock repo, but I don't quite know what that repo does. I'm curious if Firefox forks would still be subject to it.

[–] catastrophicblues@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 year ago

Yup. I might switch to Waterfox this weekend

[–] catastrophicblues@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 years ago (1 children)

True, but it's rarely solely the fault of the intern. Code reviews, work buddies, mentors, and managers are all safety nets to prevent issues in prod. No intern that doesn't have malicious intent should be able to screw up production.

[–] catastrophicblues@lemmy.ca 11 points 2 years ago

I've found that using Kagi, then DDG, then Google always gets me the results I need. But 95% of the time, Kagi gets it.

[–] catastrophicblues@lemmy.ca 9 points 2 years ago

You haven't read the article or the summary from the comments, have you?

[–] catastrophicblues@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

How would you set up a fallback kernel in Arch?

[–] catastrophicblues@lemmy.ca 6 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Yeah. Part of what I get for paying is the Bridge app so I can use Thunderbird instead of the website. I don’t want or need the LLM thing.

[–] catastrophicblues@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 years ago (3 children)

What do you use? I’d be interested in that sort of thing

[–] catastrophicblues@lemmy.ca -1 points 2 years ago (3 children)

To be fair: someone somewhere has to make algorithms that we use. I honestly don’t know if Telegram’s encryption is strong or how strong based on their white paper, but I’m interested in an unbiased evaluation.

[–] catastrophicblues@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 years ago

I’ll try it (not OP), but I finally got Thunderbird to at least read, if not write, all my calendars (Exchange excluded). It’s surprising that Google seems the most open somehow. Crazy.

[–] catastrophicblues@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 years ago

Exactly. archinstall is pretty nice, and if you want the frustration of dealing with random errors, it’s still there. But it’s straightforward (but keep the docs handy since you’ll likely need them).

 

I accidentally discovered that both "cd ..." and "..." work, and moreover, I can add more dots to go back further! I'm using zsh on iTerm2 on macOS. I'm pretty sure this isn't a cd feature. Is this specific to zsh or iTerm2? Are there other cool features I just never knew existed??

I'm so excited about an extra dot right now.

view more: next ›