chiisana

Do you have more than one network in Docker?

If so, you’d want to add a label to tell traefik which network to use; if memory serves, I think it is literally traefik.docker.network=traefik_default or something like that, where traefik_dedault should reflect the network the service is sharing with traefik — I put mine on the traefik default network from docker compose, hence the name but you may have other design.

Edit: sorry I’m on mobile right now, and I just saw you do have traefik docker network bit already, but it says media. Is that network where traefik have access?

This is incorrect; take it directly from the movie's editor, Eddie Hamilton ACE, on how the VFX CGIs were done: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZE1pOMpQvbw You can see at the 4 minutes mark where the actual jets in the movie were just stand ins, and VFX artists are told to use CGI to reskin them with the jets in the final movie.

Fairly long set of 4 videos, but this is an interesting flip side of “less CGI” discussion: https://youtu.be/7ttG90raCNo

Cool. Thanks! One less reason for me to even consider Porman on the radar. Personally, I really don’t care for the tool itself, and am way more interested in the apps that I can run and play with :)

If docker works for you, then don’t change what’s not broken. If there are things you don’t like about docker (root access etc for example) then venture out and try others. At the end of the day, they’re just tools to get to the more interesting stuff — actually running applications and playing with them.

Can’t wait for Matter and Thread become more mainstream. Local first (and device level egress blocked by VLAN) for the win.

Cool. So don’t use their app. I’d imagine HomeAssistant usage cannot be tracked as it wouldn’t go through their app.

FWIW, I’m all in on HomeKit, so I only control over Home app for my light switches from another vendor, and I’ve got no skin in the game with Leviton, but same idea applies. No vendor apps means their app based tracking are much less relevant.

Are Lutron and Leviton the same company? I’ve always wondered but never found any definitive confirmation one way or another.

Edit: see, two replies, two answers… shrouded in mystery haha

Seems to be more on the web side of things for affiliate marketing, not necessarily light switch usage patterns? At least the pasted/quoted bit doesn’t suggest that it’d cover interactions with the devices.

Does Wireguard have a centralized server that the server at home connect to in order to expose itself? If not, I don’t see how it’d work for OP, because at this point, based on info shared, I’m inclined to think OP is having trouble exposing ports (be it ISP imposed or knowledge gap) as opposed to having issue with the service / vendor.

521 = Origin server down; I.e. the port is not open and/or the IP address is incorrect all together.

522 = Origin server time out; I.e. the port might be open but no content is being sent back.

If you’re seeing 521, then Cloudflare cannot establish a connection to port 80/443 on your IP address in the A record. Bearing in mind that in order for someone from outside of your LAN (i.e CloudFlare) to have access to your services, they must be able to reach the service, so this value should be your external IP address, not an internal address. Once you have your external address keyed into the record, have someone else not in your home try to access that IP/port combination and see what happens. If they cannot access, then port forwarding is not setup or your ISP is blocking, or you’re behind some CGNAT. If they can access, then something else is at play (origin IP filtering comes to mind).

521 usually means they cannot reach your server properly. Was the router change due to a new ISP, and does the new ISP block port 80/443? Did you re-make all the relevant port forwarding rules? Changing CDN won’t change anything if your ports are closed/not responding as expected.