chillBurner

joined 3 months ago
[–] chillBurner@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Ultra rich wealth/land hoarders/exploiters

upper mid-level wealth/land hoarders,

Depends, there's many in history that can fit the bill (eg. feudal lords (crop rent), industrial capitalists (factory profit), slaveowners (goods and free labor profit), and aristocracy of finance and land (money interest and land rent) )

Their immediate managers, facilitators

Professional managerial class, or compradors for the main dominant capitalist group (eg. the West) / hegemonic capitalist group

Average workers & Average people who are dissatisfied?

Proletariat and lumpenprole?

[–] chillBurner@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Let's see here

Bourgeoisie:includes grande (big) and moyenne (medium) bourgeoisie, but essentially they are medium (regional/national) and large (global) capitalists, that mainly rely on industrial profit, if not landed rend, and financial interest, based around growing industrial and financial production

Though I consider bourgeoisie in its western context, to specifically refer to the first modern form in Europe, birthed from the Medieval period

Bourg-eois --> Bourg derives from the medieval German term for "city", as they derived from the growing cities of their era

Petty-bourgeoisie:a small business owner (only a handful of businesses directly owned by them)

Proletariat:wage/salaried laborers who depend heavily on their wage/salary, lest a few days/weeks leave em destitute and homeless

They are historically converted from the destruction of peasants, yeomanry, guild craftsmen, apprentices and mentors, during the progressive bourgeois revolution against feudalism.

Originally, in Rome, such term was derived from those citizens who made offspring to serve the Roman slave mode of production

Lumpenproletariatdespite its name, it is a similarly newly-created class of capitalism, more destitute and ruined than the proletariat, defined by a lack of official joblessness and stability, which include people from the simply unemployed and unhoused to criminals, strike-breakers, prostitutes, and gangsters

They are a wild card that can ally with either bourgeois or proletariat forces

Lumpen (rabble) + proletariat

[–] chillBurner@lemmy.ml 9 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

If there's one moderate critique, it doesn't say much when it comes to political bias ratings, which are often U.Sian centric

Like here are the 3 axes of politics to me

Economic Policy (Base)

{Domestic} Culture and Government Structure Policy (Superstructure)

Foreign Policy (Western or Eastern Alignment

But I can't understand anything when it merely comes to left and right, like in what way are they leftist or rightist, are they economically socialist/capitalist and anti-western/pro-western in foreign policy in such way too, or merely when it comes to culture and gov't policy?

[–] chillBurner@lemmy.ml 9 points 1 month ago (1 children)

technically true

[–] chillBurner@lemmy.ml 4 points 2 months ago

"So, per rental unit, this is much cheaper than the average one in Canada?"

[–] chillBurner@lemmy.ml 3 points 2 months ago

Caught in a landslide, no escape from Redditerie

view more: ‹ prev next ›