Same. It removes the ability to have plausible deniability of "oh I just forgot to tag it"—no, if you tagged it "non-AI" and it was actually vibe-coded, you clearly deliberately and consciously lied.
communism
joined 2 years ago
If they don't think animals should be kept in captivity, they shouldn't keep a pet. Pets are, by definition, captive animals. If I befriended a pigeon by feeding it, it wouldn't become my pet; it only would if I captured it.
A lot of lit from the Black liberation movement uses "Black". I'd say that the majority of people I've seen capitalise Black have been Black themselves. That isn't to say it represents a majority of Black people, but also I don't think "what do the majority of this group think" is the best metric for determining what's right—e.g. a significant amount of women are figureheads of the anti-abortion movement, but that doesn't mean that they're right or not misogynistic.
I wasn’t sure if I should use “themself” or “themselves”
Different people who use they/them will have different preferences. If you don't know the person's preference, I doubt they'd care about which you go with, and if they did, they can reach out to you after the fact and ask you to change it or to use a different option going forward in the future.
It's a political choice that some folks in the Black liberation movement choose in order to emphasise Blackness. Not all Black people do it. I don't think anyone would tell you off for choosing to capitalise it or not. Both are quite common.
...How do you smear butter on your skin then?
It's not an insult. It's the widely accepted term for the ideology of the bourgeoisie. They self-describe as liberals. That's been the usage of the term since its coining; USAmericans just decided to only use it to describe more left-leaning liberals rather than all liberals. If it's used as an insult, it's between communists accusing another communist of not being a communist, not because liberalism is inherently a pejorative. Like if a right-winger calls someone a communist as an insult, it's not because communism is a pejorative, it's because it's a non-communist accusing another non-communist of not being not-communist enough.
Wikipedia’s administrators showed that they don’t appear to value details like formal charges, a designated prosecutor, basic decorum, distinction between prosecution and judge, dispassionate adjudication
-
It would be deranged and far from a good thing if online moderation and dispute adjudication decided to use a criminal model of trying to prove a person's guilt
-
The real life criminal justice system is the opposite of unbiased and fair
I'm just confused as some comments seem to suggest it's not possible. There are already idle daemons like swayidle, so you just need to have an idle daemon execute a program that plays an animation and exits when it receives any input? I don't know of any such programs, but I don't see how it'd be impossible.
There's screen lockers. Is there a reason why programs like swaylock couldn't play an animation instead of showing a static image? Am I missing a reason why it's structurally impossible?
I've never seen it on the official web app. I suspect that, if they existed, I would've seen them used by now.
But mandating [NOT AI] means that people have to go out of their way to declare their work is AI-free. It requires active lying rather than lying by omission—I think there are a non-zero number of people who would be inclined to omit an AI tag but would not want to go as far as explicitly lying about their work being AI-free.
view more: next ›
(assuming you rent) you can use command strips to stick organisers to your walls and use vertical space. You can use some of those stationery organisers and stick it to the wall. In general see if you can use more vertical space.