Ah, I see the misunderstanding. Wikipedia lists attacks, not just shootings. Many on this list are stabbing, not shooting.
There are more school shootings in Germany?
There is a Wikipedia list, which also contains the 2023 Turkey–Syria earthquakes with ~60,000 deaths. Heatwaves in Europe are a recurring item on that list though and this one is still ongoing.
You mean the euromomo.eu page? Looks like this to me:
The data in EuroMoMo is quite stable now: The heatwave in calendar week 26 resulted in more than 15,000 excess deaths across Europe. That was worse than the flu wave this January.
Also, interesting that it was primarily France and Belgium. Then Germany.
For Portugal it was a rather normal week, it seems.
Ecosia:
Requires to be logged in though.
I believe people overestimate the difference between "state pensions" and "capital markets pensions".
The differences are more subtle. For example, the capital market is not constrained to the country but one can invest globally. However, the capital market is constrained to the economy of public companies whereas all companies pay taxes. With state pensions, is a little less determined by the economy as a state is more free to redistribute money than fund managers.
There is "wrong" and there is "different".
An investment strategy is "wrong", if it just gives lower returns or higher risk. For example, more diversification gives you equivalent returns for less risk, thus not diversifying is wrong.
An investment strategy is "different", if it lowers financial returns in return for something else. For example, you want to intentionally lower risk or not invest in evil companies. There is nothing wrong about that. You can invest with your heart, just be aware of the lower returns.
Donations can be considered a "different" investment where the financial returns are zero. In return you "save the world" a little.
That is an argument in favor. For example, Brave charges 5$ per 1000 requests. It is an additional way of earning money by not just selling to Qwant and Ecosia exclusively.
I found it is less politically correct than the US frontier models. Not sure how it compares to the Chinese ones.
I don't understand why "what they stand for" would be an argument? They are not anti-AI, as they offer one themselves.
Providing a search API is currently a hot business because coding agents need that. See for example https://exa.ai/
I wonder why EUSP does not aggressively target that market?
The people of the USA have a lot more money to invest. We need our money to pay for US tech after all.